Quantcast
Channel: Staff Picks – Youth Ki Awaaz
Viewing all 4758 articles
Browse latest View live

Why Is Our First Instinct To Dismiss A Report On India Being The Most Unsafe For Women?

$
0
0

A Thomas Reuters Foundation survey of about 550 global experts on women’s issues has ranked India as the world’s most dangerous country in a global perception poll, followed by war-torn Afghanistan and Syria. Health care, access to economic resources/ discrimination, cultural/tribal/religious or customary practices, sexual violence and harassment, non-sexual violence and human trafficking were the six areas which were considered to arrive at this conclusion. While the National Commission for Women has rejected the report, claiming that a small sample size cannot be considered as a representation for a population of 1.3 billion, I am convinced, we’re headed there for sure. If the categories considered for the poll are studied carefully, we will come across authentic data to back up the grim reality of the state of women in our country. We won’t need perceptions over hard facts that point out the obvious. So this one time let’s not feel bad for losing the chance of rejoicing at having done better than Pakistan and instead acknowledge the problem. Congratulations to us on becoming the most unsafe country for half of our population. We beat everyone in misogyny and violence against women!

In the Global Gender Gap report 2014, which benchmarks gender gaps in 142 countries in economic, political, education and health-based criteria; India ranked 141 above only Armenia. National Family Health survey indicates that 35.6 per cent of women are chronically undernourished with body mass index (BMI) lesser than the cut-off point of 18.5. India accounts for the maximum number of maternal deaths in the world, it also accounts for the highest number of deaths due to breast cancer in the world. Geography, socio-economic standing and culture contribute to the subsequent health of our female population. Illiteracy, poor sanitation, poor hygiene and nutrition, poor access to healthcare facilities, early age of marriage and forced marriage further contribute to the poor quality of health for women and girls. This is a clear indication of indifference from the concerned authorities and policymakers while dealing with women’s health issues. The women keep losing the battle with their own bodies as the society keeps on blatantly demanding domestic subservience while stripping them of their basic civil rights.

Crime against women has increased by 83 % between 2007 and 2016 according to government data and reports. More than five hundred rape cases have occurred in Delhi alone in 2018, and the overall crimes against women are on a rise compared to previous year. Sexual and sex-based brutality has outshined India on the global front. As a country, we are incredibly tolerant of the violence against women which is in fact backed up by the rapid increase in the numbers of gender-based violence cases every year. We have a plethora of crimes against women starting from sex-specific abortions resulting in declining sex-ratio to murders, dowry deaths, honour killings, female infanticide and foeticide, sexual violence, human trafficking, domestic violence, marital rape, forced and child marriage, acid-throwing, and abductions. Hence, the survey pointing out that, women are at a high risk of sexual violence and being forced into slave labour in this country is not far from the truth.

The women are expected to navigate through workplaces, homes, streets at their own risk. They are supposed to be wary of the men about to assault them and remain unruffled by the indifference of the bystanders. Are we lamenting the loss of exclusion of half the race from public life, power at home like we had in the olden days, the gradual replacement of hierarchical society with an egalitarian one? This is the only viable explanation as to why some of us are bent on removing women from public-professional domains by forever posing a threat to their safety and well being. Only consistency seen in the general attitude of perpetrators picking up the victims is their gender and it hardly matters if the victim is a three-year-old, a twenty-three old or an eighty-three-year-old woman. Women who speak up are often ridiculed, threatened, discredited and ostracized by the society and hence, most of them remain silent, losing their voice in the familiar dissonance of victim blaming. Women are, therefore, led to believe that silently removing ourselves from situations where we are actually victims is the only way out. But, we can no longer delude ourselves; we need to fight for our right to safe access to every place and at all times.

Diagnosis is the first step towards a cure and eventual recovery. Are we just focusing on the symptom instead of the cause of the disease? There’s more to the violence and misogyny towards women than the individuals who perpetrate such crimes who are held accountable and punished sometimes. We need to stop treating these assailants as outsiders and recognize them as the products of our society, a part of our community. It is easy to shift the blame on anyone or anywhere other than ourselves but what are we doing to control this pandemic?

What is wrong with our culture that keeps on producing rapists, entitled men who believe that it’s their right to assert control over a woman’s body? What is wrong with our society that keeps on perpetuating the tolerance around violence against women, which is spreading like an epidemic and all of us are allowing it to flourish? Our history, culture, society, politics have been unfair to women; it has not only been successful in marginalising and invisibilizing us, it has also cheated women out of their desired lives. I am in a serious dearth of scapegoats to burden with the responsibility of checking on this culture/society which is bent on eliminating women and their right to a full life as free citizens. I am blaming the internalised instructions for women to accommodate male pleasure, approval, comfort and their selfish demands and internalised misogyny for men to feel no discomfort in dehumanizing women. I am blaming the culture that has forever silenced the rest of us while the men watched in silence.

Is this not a real problem, a crisis that needs immediate attention? We are headed somewhere as a country, a place where no one can truly belong. Our consciences tucked away and our empathies lost long ago. Will this bring us on streets to agitate? Or are we past that too? Will this make it to the prime-hour debate with a panel of experts in newsrooms? This isn’t a lone case that media will cry hoarse about, but this is not an anomaly either, don’t let anyone fool you. This is the grim reality of our everyday existence at least the women’s and it has been here since forever and it’s not going away anytime soon. Let’s start with blaming the system that is lax at maintaining the safety of women in public spaces, despite what happened in December 2012 in Delhi, which was one time when we were angry and took to streets, demanding human rights for our girls and women. We made it to international headlines for our outrage for the ghastly gang rape. Let’s not forget it wasn’t the only gang rape or rape that happened that year. Let’s not forget despite the measures taken by the government the violence against women has increased. Let’s not forget the women who aren’t privileged enough to have a crime against them acknowledged, much less dream of justice, as they flounder through the intersections only to slip into the interstices the society loves to hide their minorities in. Bottom line is that the system is not doing enough to protect its non-male population. The presence of laws does not guarantee justice if the authorities fail to execute the laws effectively.

With the advent of social media and its indispensable presence in our lives in recent years, we have encountered, yet another way patriarchy has invented to harass women into silence. The hatred for women and the spaces they occupy has reached the comments sections and inboxes – reminding us we do not belong here, making us feel unsafe. Hate online includes everything from snubbing and insulting, mocking to unsolicited pictures of male genitalia, rape and death threats. With our faces glued to the screens; we see women speak up and share their experiences, we believe them too but we let them disappear, just another story to scroll down. Hence, succeeding in trivializing women’s experiences offline and online. A black background profile on Facebook isn’t enough; we all know it will disappear just like our anger. About time we stopped treating or rather choosing a single case of violence against women as an aberration and give it all our outrage and feel satisfied to get back to our lives.

I want to conclude this by asking women to break their silence and demand their right to safety and forever keep fighting the patriarchy which will always keep finding faults with its women. Support each other, listen to each other and stand up against those who threaten and discredit our experiences and tell us how we ought to learn to live with it. The success of #MeToo lies in the collective courage of all the women who decided to break the silence around the abuse they faced in the hands of powerful men, who thought they could forever exploit their vulnerabilities. We all need to learn from this powerful movement. I say make a scene; every time you see someone being harassed help the victim instead of the perpetrator hence, make a ruckus! Why is the dire state of women’s safety not bringing us to the streets demanding civil rights for women? Why is this not treated as a cause for national concern?

The post Why Is Our First Instinct To Dismiss A Report On India Being The Most Unsafe For Women? appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.


What I Learnt About Telugu And Culture From The Newly Released ‘Sammohanam’

$
0
0

This summer, I started reading literature in my mother tongue, Telugu. I thoroughly enjoyed immersing myself into the worlds of the characters and engaging with diverse narrative stylistics. I have always had qualms about reading Telugu, only because, growing up in Madras, I did not have enough practice with it outside my house. And that made my reading pace abysmally slow. It was only after watching this prolific Ted Talk by seasoned Telugu director Mohana Krishna Indraganti, that I took a conscious decision to at least start out with it.

The Ted Talk gave me an insight into his cognition as a filmmaker who seeks to converge his deep engagement with literature and the stories he brings forth on screen as a writer-director. What stood out for me was Indraganti’s problematization of the monolithic idea of “culture” that both the makers and audience who consume these films operate with. With references to subaltern literature that is oft ignored in our cultural consciousness, he talked about multiplicities even within what we might broadly define and sell as a single culture. Thus, if we were to pick on Telugu films that market themselves to bring out ‘Telugutanam’ or the Telugu-ness, we see that there are some fixtures – villages, Sankranti, happy joint families, and cross-cousin love stories.

Indraganti’s films, on the other hand, while never drawing from these clichés, have always piqued my interest. I have come to understand that it is the power of this writer director’s story writing that incorporates culture(s) even without having to subscribe to archetypically ‘Telugu’ storylines. Indraganti’s films are set in a plethora of worlds that range from neurotic – in the rib-tickling comedies “Ashta Chamma” and “Ami Thumi” – to the more poised ones like “Gentleman” or “Golkonda High School“. The diversity of stories in his repertoire gives one the idea that he has always exercised great reflexivity in understanding culture.

As a Social Sciences graduate pursuing my Master’s in Women’s Studies, it is a delight to see such engagement by a filmmaker, because it is a fact that society uses women’s bodies as sites of cultural preservation, which even cinema is guilty of doing. In addressing ‘culture’, then, Indraganti also balances the gender equation in his films, because they all give qualitatively equal importance to the female characters, without ever essentializing their gender roles.

It was particularly for these reasons that I was looking forward to “Sammohanam“, Indraganti’s latest film. It is a romantic tale between Sameera Rathod (Aditi Rao Hydari) as a North Indian heroine rising to the top in Telugu cinema, and Vijay (Sudheer Babu), as a children’s book illustrator who does not hold a high opinion of the film world. Vijay’s father Sarvesh (Naresh) is obsessed with cinema and even allows a film crew use his house as the setting for Sameera’s upcoming film. Upon being ridiculed for her poor Telugu, Sameera sets out to improve her diction and requests Vijay to be her tutor.

Just as the teaser and trailer released, there was a lot of conjecture about “Sammohanam” being a rip off of “Notting Hill”, and “My Week With Marilyn”, among other films. Indraganti does mention and duly credit their influence at the beginning of the film. However, his films, which have mostly been adapted from literature, tell us why being influenced by other films/literature to suit one’s own sensibilities is never a bad idea.

“Sammohanam”, for me, was like Indraganti’s Ted Talk coming alive – if Naresh’s character stood for the love of cinema, Sudheer Babu’s Vijay represented the importance of literature. Amidst its many layers, “Sammohanam” also takes us into the subtleties of a father and son relationship- they are not on the same page about cinema, but the storyline brings a confluence of the two characters and their beliefs through their bourgeoning camaraderie. The dynamics between members of Vijay’s family add another beautiful layer to the story. Vijay’s sister and mother are not merely peripheral characters- they exercise great influence on his life and thought process.

It was a delight to watch the ease with which the egalitarian gender ethos of Vijay’s family was set up, and this normalizes the possibilities of gender equality within the household. Right in the beginning, Vijay’s mother (Pavitra Lokesh) is shown running a snack business. She dines with the entire family – this was the much-needed deviation from the servile maternal figures we are used to seeing in movies. She calls her husband by his name, and is even openly expresses her sexual desire to him in a hilariously suggestive scene.

Later in the films, when the entire family goes through a crisis – the siblings have fought (Vijay’s sister screams back at him in equal measure), and the father is disillusioned – she brings lunch all the way to Vijay’s room. What stood out for me was the fact that she articulates the extra effort she has put into doing the ‘room service’, being the only one in a sane mood after the day’s events. Her act of feeding her children and husband is not taken for granted. She then goes on to explain to Vijay about handling rejection in love. I found myself clapping after each dialogue, not just because she talked about consent and rejection, but because it even addressed toxic masculinity that society and cinema tend to condone (and even celebrate) these days.

I find it heartening that movies like “Fidaa” and “Sammohanam” are able to function wonderfully with male protagonists who are honest, expressive, and do not subscribe to the stereotypical notions of masculinity. There is a song that brings out “Viraham”, the emotion of separation, from Vijay’s perspective. This was refreshing because the lyrics convey only that he misses her company. There is no cliched reference to her beauty at all. In another scene, Vijay pithily refuses a glass of alcohol that his friend offers as succour for Sameera’s rejection of his proposal. He also bares his heart out to Sameera about why girls don’t find him attractive, and about his idea of romance, which Indraganti constructs so beautifully.

The shot of two coffee cups that Vijay holds while walking towards Sameera’s vanity van to begin the Telugu tutoring sessions remains etched in my memory. It conveyed to me, the essence of how romance in the movie was going to unfold – over conversations, on rainy evenings, and under the starry skies on the terrace. The numerous close up shots of the faces of Vijay and Sameera, while they converse, are delightful because we see Indraganti’s faith in his actors and his ability to extract subtle emotions through their eyes.

Sameera’s characterization challenges the notion of a ‘strong woman’, which has time and again been misappropriated and misrepresented in our cinema. In ‘Sammohanam’, her strength lies in her vulnerability. Sameera’s body or personality is not meant to pander to any cultural or personal transformation. In the first tutoring session, we see Sameera clad in a churidaar (she plays a typical, helpless Telugu heroine in the movie that she is shooting for). But, as she begins to master the language, we see the real Sameera wearing more of western attire. I may be extrapolating here, but I found this symbolism very interesting, given that this subverts how cinema has always dealt with women becoming ‘cultured’ – a classic case in point being the problematic transition of Anjali in “Kuch Kuch Hota Hai” into a more ‘feminine’ woman. Here, however, Vijay tells her that she looks stunning when he sees her in a churidaar, and later, even when she dons a short floral dress while staying over at Vijay’s house post shooting. There is also a rhetoric value in Indraganti’s engagement with the gender politics behind questions that arise about Sameera’s (sexual) morality as a rising superstar.

The ease with which “Sammohanam” brings forth these representations into its storyline has taught me a lot more about why we need a more nuanced understanding of culture. Culture is also about taking care to pronounce your language properly. In a hilarious scene, Naresh talks about the ‘stress-free’ enunciation of actors these days, devoid of the “ha” syllable (in the very first shot in the trailer, I was delirious to hear Sudheer Babu pronounce “Abaddham” perfectly).

Culture is about being proud of one’s language without necessarily having to be ethnocentric. Representing culture in cinema means a director taking interest in presenting good lyrics and raagas that are seldom used these days. It is about invoking curiosity about the vastness of the Telugu lexicon. “Sammohanam”, true to its title was enchanting. Indraganti has shown us that culture is neither unitary nor frozen in time and that it can be adapted to different epochs. He has brought back the much-needed academic rigour into filmmaking.

Image source: Facebook

The post What I Learnt About Telugu And Culture From The Newly Released ‘Sammohanam’ appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

Being Proud Is Not Enough: What Makes Up My Kaleidoscopic Queer Narrative

$
0
0

By: Aroh Akunth

When I sat down to write this article about my queer experiences, I struggled with the question of what counts as my queer experience. Can I, being a queer individual even have non-queer experiences? Would it then discount the experiences of those who fall for the same old opposite-sex partners, but are yet very queer? Isn’t the whole idea of being exclusively attracted to the opposite-sex, queer in itself? Clearly the aforementioned isn’t something that concerns only me and is best left to experts, but when I think about my queer experiences, I can think of a few ways in which my politics and being have evolved over the years, and that’s precisely what I will try to delve into here.

I remember never having a ‘coming out’ moment as such – I was the youngest and the most flamboyant (read extra) in the family, loosely holding on to my masculinity. This is the embarrassing bit: I recall my first crushes being Disney characters Nala and The Little Mermaid’s dad (the latter because he was the only shirtless cartoon on TV). When I was young, people would often confuse me for a girl, and I didn’t mind it one bit. In fact, I enjoyed it. It gave me a sense of power and made me feel closer to my mother and grandmother – my two favourite family members. Growing up, my mother instilled a sense of pride in me about my caste and gender identity, which I carry with me even today. Growing up, my mother instilled in me a sense of pride about my caste and gender identity which I carry with me to date.

I remember having discussions about caste in middle school where classmates would unanimously ask me to shut the fuck up – not because they were casteist, but because, at least to them, my discussion was always out-of-the-syllabus. That’s how caste and gender are still taught in school – as syllabi rather than realities. It is treated as something abstract to research (by mostly savarna cis-het academics). As a Dalit and queer person, I could connect the similar oppressions these identities face and how within the queer and Dalit spaces, both can be stifled.

These realizations come to oppressed individuals not only (or almost never) because of what they study, but more out of what they experience. Often these discoveries come at a cost –  like every queer Dalit individual, I was bullied for who I was, openly called names, groped – I remember someone putting a cigarette butt to my skin for being effeminate and fat, even as they said, “We’re just burning fat, it shouldn’t hurt.” 

I was asked to go to conversion therapy, and I will not excuse the people who did this in the name of being unaware. To say that they were unaware would mean that they got nothing out of what they did and the way they did it. I believe that these bullies often know what is up, but they still go ahead with being cruel to satisfy their need to feel powerful. I don’t think a Dalit queer person can get rid of such harassment ever in their life. After being put through it, I could see my earlier experience of pride, and the later experience of bullying interact with each other in ways that I decided to do something about it and call people out on it.

In my university I got elected as a representative for the Committee of Prevention of Sexual Harassment, but what I soon realized was that even in liberal places, with the best of policies and governments which are popularly elected and considered ‘better’, there’s a lot that the policies don’t cover –  individuals of certain backgrounds are not only systematically disadvantaged but prosecuted under the same laws – and my university was no exception. This was when I finally decided that, as marginalised individuals who always have the cards stacked against us, just being proud and having a political stance is not enough. It is our job to bring down these houses of cards which savarna cis-hets or any other oppressors pride themselves on.

When students were challenging institutional discrimination at Ambedkar University Delhi (AUD), there were students who ceased to be friends with me for the allegations that were brought against their dear university. These were people who were my friends, who had up till then shared secrets, committees, classroom spaces, performances, parties, and crushes with me. They did not even bother to contact me or any formal source in any way individually, before writing pieces of ‘investigative journalism’ about me. Their opinions can still be justified, but their hate posts were peppered with slight shots at my character, my credibility as a student of AUD, and outright casteist homophobic slander.

This, however, is not to say that I didn’t anticipate this behaviour from them, and I’m definitely not the only person that this has happened with, but to make a larger point about how savarna-cis-het associations work in tandem with each other in institutions to maintain the hierarchy of a certain group of individuals. Denying someone their experience, and asking them to provide evidence is not only a very violent form of oppression, but it also stems from a certain kind of entitlement which in turn discloses the societal location of the critics who are asking for it. For them, neither an anonymous list nor absence of a proper mechanism seems to be a problem, all they care about is the shame they have to experience for some time while they shame the very existence of certain people based on their identities.

I have often been called a crybaby. For them, my tears cannot possibly be of resistance. But thankfully – maybe because humans sometimes barter some good for all the bad they do or maybe because my institution is named after Babasaheb – the larger student body, teachers and individuals are still working on instituting mandatory bodies like the Equal Opportunity Cell, SC/ST Cell, more representative bodies and effective mechanisms for dealing with cyberbullying. And I am continuing my education and activism.

But being queer is not always about your oppression or resistance, it is the spaces in between the two. For me, it is as much about writing and performing mostly (if not all) female, Dalit, and queer characters; about how my school friends and family who very well know that I am queer (and have known it for a while), but do not bring it up actively because my relationship with them is a non-sexual one purely based on the activities we enjoy, or kinship; it is about me sleeping with just men for the next eight years straight and still being a bisexual; it’s about me not buying the whole top – bottom binary; it is about my mental and chronic illnesses because even when I am unable to breathe, I want to breathe as a queer, even when I am depressed, I binge on gay dramas; it’s about how I navigate interracial relationships and my inter-caste identity.

It’s also as much about my male, class and abled privileges. It’s about me identifying as an atheist, and yet knowing how this identity has been exercised to erase people’s caste privileges in our country, its multiple ‘ists’ that make me and are yet to be identified – feminist, nudist, environmentalist, anarchist (?). When I started writing this piece, I had no idea how to paint a queer narrative. I guess it can’t be painted; it has to be a kaleidoscope. It’s in all of us and yet nothing tangible, very much like queers, it’s there.

Aroh Akunth has done their Bachelor’s in Social Sciences & Humanities from Ambedkar University Delhi. They often write about their experiences with queerness and caste and have a keen interest in literature, activism and the performing arts. They are currently pursuing their Masters in Criminology and Justice from Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai.

The post Being Proud Is Not Enough: What Makes Up My Kaleidoscopic Queer Narrative appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

CM रावत जी, ट्रांसफर की गुहार लगा रही शिक्षिका को धमका कर आपने जनता का विश्वास खोया है

$
0
0

नमस्कार मुख्यमंत्री जी,

आशा है आप अच्छे ही होंगे। आपने लोगों ने ज्ञापन और याचना पत्र तो खूब लिखे होंगे पर शायद आपको खुला खत पहली बार लिखा जा रहा होगा। वैसे तो ये मायने नहीं रखता कि इस खत का नंबर क्या है पर जिस पार्टी विशेष का आप हिस्सा हैं, वह पहले स्थान को ज़्यादा महत्व देती है तभी लगा कि इसे पहला खुला खत नाम देना ज़रूरी है।

कल एक वीडियो दिखा जिसमें एक उत्तरकाशी ज़िले के एक गांव नौगांव में पिछले 25 सालों से कार्य कर रही एक शिक्षिका उत्तरा पंत बहुगुणा जनता दरबार में आपसे ट्रांसफर से सम्बंधित मुद्दे पर अपनी बात कहने आई थी, परन्तु किसी कारणवश ये बातचीत गलत दिशा में मुड़ गयी और आपको उसे सस्पेंड करने के निर्देश देने पड़े।

मुख्यमंत्री जी फेसबुक पर सुबह एक वीडियो वायरल हो रहा था जिसमें उक्त शिक्षिका के द्वारा किया गया बर्ताव मुझे खल रहा था कि एक राजकीय शिक्षिका राज्य के प्रमुख यानि आपके साथ ऐसा बर्ताव कैसे कर सकती है और उसे ऐसा करना भी नहीं चाहिए क्योंकि हर पद की एक गरिमा होती है और उसे निभाना सभी से आपेक्षित है।

परन्तु जब शाम में मैंने पूरा वीडियो देखा तो मुझे महसूस हुआ कि शिक्षिका का आपा खोना पहले दौर का व्यवहार नहीं था। एक विधवा शिक्षिका जो 25 साल से दुर्गम क्षेत्र में नौकरी कर रही है वो अपने मुख्यमंत्री से उसकी बात सही से सुन लेने की अपेक्षा तो कर ही सकती है।

मुख्यमंत्री जी हमारा प्रदेश बहुत छोटा सा है, इस छोटे प्रदेश की सबसे बड़ी खासियत यह है कि हर कोई मुख्यमंत्री का नंबर लिए घूमता है और कोई ना कोई मंत्री किसी ना किसी का रिश्तेदार तो ज़रूर ही निकल जाता है। अगर रिश्तेदार ना भी निकले तो हर पार्टी कैडर के कुछ अति महत्वपूर्ण लोग जनता और प्रशासन के बीच में गेटवे बनाने का महत्वपूर्ण योगदान करते ही रहते हैं।

अगर ऐसे में भी शिक्षा विभाग जैसे सबसे बड़े तंत्र में बिना किसी गेटवे के कोई अपना काम करवाने की सोच भी रहा है तो व्यक्ति सच में बहुत निराश हो चुका है। आप उस से कम-से-कम सीधे मुंह बात कर ही सकते थे। एक मुख्यमंत्री सीधे तौर पर भीड़ के आखिर में खड़े इंसान को धमकाए तो इसमें नुकसान उस आखिरी इंसान का नहीं है, बल्कि मुख्यमंत्री का है जिसके पास खोने को बहुत कुछ है।

आपकी सरकार में राज्य ने गत वर्ष ट्रांसफर एक्ट विधानसभा में पारित किया और इस पर अपनी पीठ भी थपथपाई परन्तु हालत कुछ नहीं बदले। पीछे के रस्ते की कहानियां अभी भी बरकरार हैं। मैं खुद ऐसे कई लोगों से मिला हूं, जिन्होंने ज़िंन्दगी एक ही स्कूल में गुज़ार दी। खैर, मैं मानता हूं कि ट्रांसफर नीति के बाद भी गलतियां हो जाती हैं और भूल चूक में यह महिला भी रह गयी होगी।

सोशल मीडिया पर कई लोग आपके परिवार पर निजी हमले कर रहे थे कि आपकी धर्मपत्नी भी कई वर्षों से एक ही स्थान में कार्यरत हैं, परन्तु मैं मानता हूं कि अधिकतर मंत्रियों को पत्नियों की एक ही जगह में तैनाती भी शायद इसी भूल-चूक में शामिल होंगी जिन्हें वक्त रहते आप सुधार देंगे।

मुख्यमंत्री जी आपको उस विधवा शिक्षिका जो कि आपके तंत्र की एक अंग है उससे इस भाषा में बात नहीं करनी चाहिए थी जब महिला ने अपनी बात कही तो सवाल के जवाब में यह कहना, “नौकरी में आते समय क्या लिख कर दिया था?” उचित नहीं ही था। उसमें भावुक होकर महिला ने जब जवाब दिया, “ज़िन्दगी भर वनवास में रहेंगे, यह थोड़ी लिखकर दिया था।”

जब आपने थोड़ी बातचीत की टोन को अलग तरह से सेट कर दिया था तो उसमें प्रतिक्रिया तो आनी ही थी और वह प्रतिक्रिया इतनी भी बुरी नहीं थी कि आप उसे बाहर निकलवा दें और सस्पेंड करने की धमकी दें। शिक्षिका के बर्ताव को सही नहीं ही कहा जा सकता, परन्तु जब सामने मुख्यमंत्री आपा खो दे तो एक छोटा सा मुलाजिम कर भी क्या सकता है?

कल जनता दरबार में हुई यह घटना में टकराव उस महिला और आप का नहीं है। आप बहुत ताकतवर हैं, वो महिला बहुत कमज़ोर, यह टकराव की घटना है एक तंत्र की और एक तंत्र के सर्वोच्च पद पर बैठे इंसान की। आपकी पार्टी इतिहास को बहुत महत्वपूर्ण स्थान देती है, उसी इतिहास के पन्ने अगर पलट लीजिये तो कई राजाओं की कहानियां आपको मिल जाएंगी, जिन्होंने अपने आसपास की सच्ची घटनाओं को नज़रंदाज़ करते हुए अपने दरबारियों के सुनाये किस्सों पर ही ध्यान दिया। फिर एक दिन सब कुछ गवां बैठे। मुख्यमंत्री जी आपका राजतंत्र सच में गल चुका है जिसमें आपके अपने विधायकों और मंत्रियों के किस्से कहानियां बीच-बीच में सुनने को आ ही जाते हैं। पर ऐसे में आपने बहुत सरल रास्ता चुना कि ताकतवरों को रहने दो कमज़ोरों की आवाज़ को खत्म करो।

संत कवि रहीमदास जी का बहुत ही प्रचलित दोहा है-

क्षमा बड़न को चाहिये, छोटन को उत्पात। 
का रहीम हरी का घट्यो, जो भृगु मारी लात।।

अर्थात उद्दंडता करने वाले हमेशा छोटे कहे जाते हैं और क्षमा करने वाले ही बड़े बनते हैं। ऋषि भृगु ने भगवान विष्णु की सहिष्णुता की परीक्षा लेने के लिए उनके वक्ष पर ज़ोर से लात मारी। मगर क्षमावान भगवान ने नम्रतापूर्वक उनसे ही पूछा, “अरे! आपके पैर में चोट तो नहीं लगी? क्योंकि मेरा वक्षस्थल कठोर है और आपके चरण बहुत कोमल हैं।”

भृगु महाराज ने क्रोध करके स्वयं को छोटा प्रमाणित कर दिया जबकि विष्णु भगवान क्षमा करके और भी बड़े हो गएं।अधिकतर प्रहार करने के लिए लात की भी आवश्यकता नहीं पड़ती, हमारी जिह्वा ही पर्याप्त होती है।

आप मुख्यमंत्री हैं और बड़े हैं ऐसे में आपसे अपेक्षा ही की जा सकती है। अपने तंत्र को संभालने के लिए उचित कदम उठाएं। इस बात को रहने ही दें कि पिछली सरकार ने ये किया वो किया। आप अगर पार्टी के मुख्यमंत्री से हटकर लोगों के मुख्यमंत्री बने तो शायद आपको लंबे वक्त तक याद किया जायेगा वरना जितने वक्त आप रहें उसके बाद पूर्व मुख्यमंत्रियों की लिस्ट तो हर राज्य की ही लंबी चौड़ी है, जिसे कोई भी याद नहीं ही रखता।

आप के राज्य का अदना सा एक लड़का
बिमल रतूड़ी

The post CM रावत जी, ट्रांसफर की गुहार लगा रही शिक्षिका को धमका कर आपने जनता का विश्वास खोया है appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

Why Pakistan Loved To Hate Its First Viral Star Qandeel Baloch

$
0
0

‘You’re going to miss me when I am gone. Kitnay gunday ho aap log waisay, double standard log. You like to watch me, and then you like to say, ‘Why don’t you just die?’’’

As a society, we have systematically suppressed women for so long that even an act of silliness or self-indulgence on their part, is considered as rebellion. One that is tantamount to an immediate dishonour to her family. From celebrities to working-class women, this scrutiny subsumes us to varying degrees – from what we wear to where we work, from what we share on social media to whom we are seen with – even subconsciously, we choose to tread carefully. Sometimes we crave to be invisible, put on blinders and keep trudging on, just to be able to live our lives on our terms.

Or not.

Pakistani actress, model and social media sensation Qandeel Baloch was the country’s viral star, so to speak. She first shot to fame with her audition on Pakistan Idol and kept returning to media spotlight – promising to strip for Shahid Afridi if he won a T20 cricket match against India, wanting to marry Imran Khan after his divorce, and her meeting with senior cleric Mufti Abdul Qawi in his hotel room, where she interviewed him using a selfie stick, sitting on the armrest of his couch, and then promptly proceeding to wear his hat.

Baloch was not afraid of seeking attention. In her videos, she’d lie on her bed with her cat-winged eyeliner and ask you in a slow voice – ‘How I’m looking?’ Beautiful, sexy or hot?

In July 2016, journalist Sanam Maher remembers staring at the television on discovering that Baloch had been a victim of honour killing – she was choked to death by her younger brother for “bringing disrepute” to their family. Earlier she had thought that Baloch would be a great person to focus on while writing a piece about how young women in Pakistan are pushing the envelope on how they can dress speak or present themselves in Pakistan. The piece was never written, lost somewhere between deadlines and switching jobs, but on finding out about her death, Maher didn’t want to let go of her story once again.

Sanam Maher

“In the hours and days after, it was terrible to see the reactions online from many Pakistanis who were very happy that she had been ‘punished’ for behaving the way that she did. I saw acquaintances in my own social media feeds having arguments about whether what had happened was right or wrong, whether Baloch “deserved” what had been done to her. ‘Offline’, many of the men and women I knew were condemning Baloch’s death but then, in the next breath, following their statements with “… but if you think about it…”

She realized that reactions to Baloch’s murder had revealed two very different answers to the question of what it means to be Pakistani, and more crucially, what it means to be a woman living in Pakistan today. Maher feels that this definition is not static, but ever evolving, depending on who you’re talking to. This contradiction forms the crux of her book, The Sensational Life and Death of Qandeel Baloch – “I wanted to tell a story not just about Qandeel, but about that definition. I knew that this book wasn’t just about Qandeel, but about the kind of place that enabled her to become who she did, and the place that ultimately found that it could not tolerate her.”

While the book is very much about who she was, it doesn’t just focus on Baloch. Maher adds, “Since she created a persona that she knew would appeal to us, what we saw reflected back to ourselves when we watched Baloch’s videos or looked at her photographs? So the book uses parts of Baloch’s life in order to open up into a story about Pakistan and young Pakistanis at this particular moment.”

So for instance, when looking at Baloch’s fame as a viral star, she began to think about how her generation of Pakistanis was connected to the world like never before – what they were doing online and what did it mean to go viral in Pakistan? How were they building communities online in order to speak in ways that were not permissible “offline”? What happened when rules of the offline world are broken online, particularly as women?

Maher met everyone from trolls and hacktivists to Nighat Dad, the creator of Pakistan’s first cyber harassment hotline to learn “how our “offline” tendencies, such as our kneejerk reactions to women who don’t behave or look or talk like we might want or expect them to, are creeping online. I wanted to explore how we might be connected to a global space of ideas and possibilities online, but we’re still very much grounded in the society and culture we live in here in Pakistan, and through Baloch’s story and some of the others in the book, you see the terrible ramifications that a clash between the two can have.”

The author finished researching and writing this book in about a year’s time; it was a very tight deadline to not just tell Baloch’s story, but also find a way to talk about the world that she lived in Pakistan. That meant trying to squeeze in more than 100 interviews across the country within a couple of months. But at times, she also felt helpless in trying to report about someone she had never met or spoken to in her life. With all the news reports, gossip, TV shows and documentaries, it didn’t help that everyone she interviewed or spoke to felt convinced that they knew the ‘Baloch story’.

Maher also became pretty used to people asking, “Why would you waste your time writing on someone like Baloch?”, or, “Don’t you have anything more important to work on?” But often, she realized, naysayers can also prove to be helpful.

“Many times I would be interviewing someone and they would be scornful or confused about why I was bothering to write a book when ‘Pakistanis don’t read’, and so they end up telling you a lot more than they would tell a TV reporter or documentary film crew, for instance, because they’re so confident that no one will pick up your work,” she says.

The author feels that people at large didn’t hate Baloch because she was supposedly “bringing dishonour” to her family. Her relatives or people in the village she came from may have felt that and passed judgement on her for that. But in terms of her haters, she thinks some were just amazed that she didn’t seem to give a damn about what people said. In many of her interviews, news anchors repeatedly asked her to stop posting provocative photos or videos – “Don’t you see what people say to you in the comments?” They seemed to constantly be asking, “What kind of woman are you? What kind of woman would behave this way?”

She says, “She didn’t neatly align with our ideas of how women can and should behave, even in the face of criticism, and we just could not stop looking at what she did next.”

In the book, police officer Attiya Jaffrey who was investigating the homicide, asks Maher, “Is becoming Baloch Baloch ‘freedom’?” In her opinion, no matter how headstrong a woman is, she should also be mindful of the society she lives in. In the larger context of women’s emancipation in Pakistan, what is really the answer to this question?

“The answer to the question of what it looks like to have freedom lies partly in our willingness to stop prescribing what it looks like.”

An Anti Honour Killing Bill was passed soon after Baloch’s death (the same year recorded a 1000 deaths by honour killing in Pakistan), but has there been a visible deterrent, keeping families from taking the lives of women who defy them in any way?

Maher thinks that it is going to take a lot more time to see significant, lasting change on the ground, and that change can only come when there is a cultural and social shift when it comes to the motivations for honour crimes against men and women – “Legislation alone cannot bring about the change.”

Ever since the book’s release, the author has been getting messages from readers in Pakistan and all over the world – typing out their thoughts or trying to start a conversation about the questions raised in the book. They send pictures of the book from all over, “Qandeel has been travelling the world!” she says.

Soon after Baloch’s death, her Facebook page had disappeared. The author writes in the book that while it might be impossible for someone to find her unmarked grave in her hometown of Shah Sadar Din, her videos and photographs have been copied and shared across social media platforms, blogs and websites countless times.

“They cannot be erased.”

The post Why Pakistan Loved To Hate Its First Viral Star Qandeel Baloch appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

50 Rejections Later, I Jotted The 11 Things I Learnt About Internship Hunting

$
0
0

I’m really excited to say that I am going to be interning at Workday this summer as a Software Engineer Intern! After months of applying, interviewing, emailing, networking, the countless hours of work had finally paid off. I had received more than 50 emails along the lines of “We regret to inform you that…”, “This year, we received a record number of applications and unfortunately cannot consider…”, or “We thoroughly enjoyed reading your application, but….”.

It was really frustrating to invest so much thought, time, and energy towards finding an internship. It was a Catch 22: I was trying to find experience to grow my skills, but companies already expected me to have a ton of experience under my belt.

Even though the process was gruelling, the effort was worth it, and I actually learned a lot more than I thought I would.

Lesson 1: Start Early

Last summer, I started looking for an internship in March, which was way too late (I was a freshman, what would I know). I didn’t end up getting any offers for summer 2017. I learned my lesson the hard way, but you don’t have to! Start as soon as you can, that way you’ll have plenty of time to apply, prepare for interviews, and you don’t risk missing out on some really cool opportunities! Starting early will also ease your stress levels especially when school picks up. August would be a good time to start getting in the groove of things, in fact, a lot of companies start releasing internship applications before that, so keep your eyes peeled.

If anything, make a spreadsheet of the companies you want to apply to and make note of the deadlines. Be aware of companies that have rolling applications, and apply early to those (there’s a higher chance that your application will move forward if you apply earlier).

Lesson 2: Find A Mentor

When August rolled around, I had no idea where to start my search. I reached out to a friend, who I knew had a history of working at really amazing and prestigious companies. We both knew of each other, but we weren’t close friends. I decided to take a leap of faith and reach out — there was nothing to lose. She said she’d love to help (!). I met her at a coffee shop, and she helped me apply to some of my first jobs and gave me tips on how to find opportunities and stay organised. She also helped me practice for some of my interviews! She and I clicked really well, and after, we hung out regularly to chat or study. She’s now one of my best friends at school, and I know that I wouldn’t have this friendship if I hadn’t mustered up the courage to reach out for help.

Finding a supportive mentor who I could talk to about my progress was really encouraging and stress relieving as well. You don’t need to suffer alone! People have been there done that, and they are willing to help. Reach out to people and don’t be afraid.

Lesson 3: Practice, Practice, Practice

For technical interviews, it’s important to keep practising the types of questions that interviewers might ask. Do a couple of problems a day, practice with your friends on a whiteboard, and make sure to nail your elevator pitch. For behaviour interviews, practice with friends, see how you talk in front of the mirror, record yourself. To get a grip on technical questions, I highly recommend Cracking the Coding Interview, Leetcode, Hackerrank, Topcoder, and Geeks for Geeks. Use your resources because they are there for a reason!

Getting interviews can be hard, and the last thing you want to do is blow an opportunity and have regrets about not practising enough.

Lesson 4: Your Network Is Your Net Worth

Finding an internship will be hard if you make it hard. Applying online doesn’t always have to be the go-to method. Go to career fairs, tech talks, and networking events to meet recruiters and have conversations with them face to face. Although this is extra work, it can go a really long way. Try to message recruiters on LinkedIn (you can get LinkedIn premium for a month), or reach out to friends who have worked at companies you’re interested in working at. They probably have emails that you can reach out to. Emailing recruiters will set you apart from the hundreds (even thousands) of applications that companies get. It’s a more personal, less robotic, way of showing who you are. You’re showing that you have interest and are taking initiative, and that’s great. The hiring process will go incredibly faster as well (it’s like you get to cut in line or get a fast pass for free!).

Lesson 5: Hone Your Resume

This one might be a no-brainer, but your resume is often the first thing that a recruiter will see when they look at your application. Make sure your resume is up to date, clean, and has zero typos and errors. Highlight your relevant coursework, skills, GPA, projects, and previous work experience. Tailor your resume to the job you are applying to and cut out what’s unnecessary or irrelevant.

Lesson 6: Don’t Settle For Less

There may be times when you receive an offer (yay! how exciting), but it isn’t exactly what you were looking for. In some ways, it can be a good thing, but in other ways, the job might not align with your goals (at all). After around three months of recruiting, I received a job offer, but I realised that it was for a position that was really not interesting to me. Some people told me that “any experience is good experience” (which is true to some extent), but others told me that I should just drop an offer if I didn’t like it. Remember that recruiting is a two-way street: the company is not only evaluating you, but you are also evaluating the company. Don’t forget that.

It’s really hard to determine where to draw the line, but from my personal experience, I realised that the offer I received really didn’t align with how I wanted to spend my summer. Some of the questions I asked myself (in no particular order of importance) to make a decision were:

1) In what ways will I grow if I take this opportunity?
2) Is it too late in the game to drop this opportunity and keep searching?
3) Will I be happy working at company x doing job y?
4) What is the internship experience like?
5) How will my skillset grow?
6) Does the company’s mission align with my own personal values?
7) How much does the company value its employees?
8) Will I be 100% satisfied if I take this job?
9) What is my heart saying?
10) Am I passionate about what this company does?

It’s hard to drop offers. It’s so easy to feel inclined to take an offer for the sake of being done with recruiting. But remember that your happiness matters. After I dropped my first offer, I was scared that I wouldn’t receive another one, and I’d regret dropping the original offer. But that fear pushed me harder, and I’m really glad that I didn’t consider the first offer because the one that I have now really does align a lot better with my future goals.

Lesson 7: Keep Building Your Skills

This one’s important. Companies want to see what you do outside of the classroom that makes you an expert in your field. Research? Extracurriculars? A part-time internship? Participating in those activities stands out. The first semester, I felt like I lacked work experience, so I reached out to some local startups and saw if they had work that I could do. I landed a part-time spring internship at Kiwi Campus, one of the biggest startups in Berkeley, and this new addition to my resume really stood out. Just remember to stay involved, and keep working hard. I promise that it pays off.

Lesson 8: Consider All Your Options

The point of having an internship is for you to evaluate whether or not you like doing a specific kind of work. Don’t be afraid to apply for jobs that are a bit outside of your realm. The worst case scenario is that you dislike the work. Sometimes, knowing what you don’t like could be more beneficial than knowing what you do like. When it comes to applying to full-time jobs, you’re going to need to understand what work you like to do, because changing jobs often gets harder as you get older. If you try different types of work and realise that you like it, that’s great! You could start taking college/online courses related to that area of study. Consider keeping all your options open, and you’ll be doing yourself a favour in the long run!

Lesson 9: Don’t Chase ₹ Or The Titles

If your only interest is the money or the rank of the company you work at, you really should consider re-evaluating your priorities. There are some amazing companies and jobs out there that are so undervalued. Just focus on being the best you can be at what you do, and the money and the titles will follow along. Don’t base your choices solely on how much you are getting paid or the title of the company you’re working at. Trust me, it won’t help you in the long haul.

Lesson 10: Have Faith In Yourself

If you’re reading this, it shows that you are committed to working hard and making your life what you want it to be. Be confident and proud of how far you’ve come! Don’t feel down after getting rejections or having bad interview experiences (I’ve had plenty). Virtually everyone around you is going through the same process. Just remember that everything works out in the end. You got this!

Lesson 11: Celebrate!

After you have officially signed with a company, give yourself a pat on the back! You did it! But didn’t you receive help? Always remember to thank people who helped you practice interviews, refine your resume, gave you positive words of encouragement. The people who care about you want you to do well, the least you can do is share your success with them. I suggest sending over a personal message to people and to the people who were there every step of the way (those people are hard to find), take them out to coffee or dinner! Another way to give back is to pay it forward  - make other people’s job hunting experience easier, whether it be offering a recruiter email or interview practice session, a little bit of kindness goes a really long way. Stay humble, and never stop grinding.

This article was first published on the author’s Medium account, here.

_

Image used for representation only.
Image source: Priyanka Parashar/Mint via Getty Images

The post 50 Rejections Later, I Jotted The 11 Things I Learnt About Internship Hunting appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

बाबा नागार्जुन: अभी उनका दिल जवान है!

$
0
0

पीपीएच, दिल्ली में मेरे जीवन की पहली नौकरी थी। अनिल दा (प्रख्यात मार्क्सवादी चिंतक-शिक्षक-लेखक अनिल राजिमवाले) की दो लाइन का पोस्टकार्ड पाते ही मैं बिना देर किये पटना से दिल्ली रवाना हो गया था। दिल्ली पहुंचने के दूसरे दिन अनिल दा मुझे झंडेवाला स्थित पीपीएच के हेडक्वार्टर रजनीपाम दत्त भवन ले गये। वहां उन्होंने मुझे सीधे संपादकीय विभाग के इंचार्ज मुंशी जी (स्व. रामशरण शर्मा ‘मुंशी’) के हवाले कर दिया। अनिल दा जब मेरा परिचय देने लगे तो मुंशी जी ने तपाक से कहा, “मुझे पता है इनके बारे में। नागार्जुन के मित्र कवि कन्हैया के पुत्र सुमन्त।”

बाद में पता लगने पर कि मुंशी जी हिंदी के सबसे बड़े मार्क्सवादी आलोचक रामविलास शर्मा के छोटे भाई हैं तो मेरा अभिमान बालिश्त भर बढ़ गया। मुंशी जी से जब मैंने पूछा कि आपको कैसे मालूम कि मेरे पिता नागार्जुन के मित्र हैं तो उन्होंने बताया, “नागार्जुन जब पटना के बारे में ज़िक्र करते हैं तो कन्हैया जी का नाम ज़रूर लेते हैं।”

फिर तो नागार्जुन, रामविलास शर्मा तथा अपने रिश्ते के बारे में वे ढेरों अंतरंग संस्मरण सुनाने लगे। उसी सिलसिले में उन्होंने एक ऐसा संस्मरण भी सुनाया जिसे जाने बिना मेरी समझ से, हमारे समय के इन दोनों ही महामानव (बाबा नागार्जुन, रामविलास शर्मा) के मन की बनावट को समझा नहीं जा सकता।

उस दिन बाबा नागार्जुन, मुंशी जी के यहां खाने पर आमंत्रित थे। रामविलास जी भी तब दिल्ली आकर बस चुके थे। तीनों ही खाने पर बैठे। मुंशी जी की टीचर पत्नी धन्नो जी सीधे तावा पर सेंकी हुई रोटियां परोस रही थीं। बाबा ने कुछ रोटियां खाने के बाद और रोटी परोसने को मना कर दिया। मगर, धन्नो जी लाख मना करने के बाद भी लाड़ से एक रोटी डाल ही दीं। फिर क्या था, बाबा एकदम से बरस पड़े धन्नो जी पर। मामला बहुत बिगड़ता देख रामविलास जी ने बाबा की लगाम थामी, “नागार्जुन, तुम तो धन्नो पर ऐसे बिगड़ रहे हो जैसे वह तुम्हारी पत्नी है!” बाबा की तो बोलती ही बंद! ऐसे झक्की थे बाबा।

बाबा की यह अद्भुत विशेषता थी! वह जिस घर में ठहरते, वहां वे पूरे घर को अपना मुरीद बना लेते थे, खासकर पत्नियों को। वे खाने में अपनी पसंदगी के बड़े पक्के थे, यह चाहिए… वह चाहिए! ज़रा भी इधर-उधर हुआ नहीं कि पिनक पड़ते थे।

पत्नियां जो उन्हें जानती थीं, सतर्क हो जाती थीं। पटना में ही उनके एक परम अनुयायी कवि अंकिमचंद्र ‘अरुण’ की पत्नी का विचित्र अनुभव था। वे बताती थीं, “बाबा उन्हें बेटी की तरह प्यार करते हैं। मेरी बीमारी को लेकर खूब दुखी रहा करते हैं। मगर, खाना खिलाने में ज़रा भी इधर-उधर हुआ नहीं कि उनकी पिनक देखते ही बनती है।”

हालांकि वे लंगरटोली, पटना वाले हमारे घर भी यदाकदा आते थे। मगर, मेरी मां का क्या अनुभव था उन्हें खाना खिलाने में, मां ने हमें यह कभी नहीं बताया।

बाबा नागार्जुन ने थोड़े ही समय के लिए बौद्ध भिक्षु के तौर पर महान यायावर तथा प्रकांड बौद्ध विद्वान राहुल सांकृत्यायन की शागिर्दी भी की थी। तो शायद यह उसी का असर था कि बाबा के जीवन में भी रोमांटिसिज़्म कम नहीं था! महिलाएं और लड़कियां उनके लिए एक विचित्र खिंचाव का सबब थीं! उनके प्रति उनका व्यवहार संतई और थोड़ी-थोड़ी लफंगई दोनों ही तरह का होता था!

बाबा का JNU में भी खूब मन लगता था। वहां वे अक्सर एक प्रोफेसर दंपति के यहां टिकते थे। तुलसी जी (प्रो. तुलसी राम) उन दिनों अध्ययन ही कर रहे थे। उन्होंने एक बार मुझे बताया, बाबा का मन वहां ही क्यों टिकता है जानते हैं सुमन्त जी? यह बात स्वयं बाबा ने ही कुछ वाचाल लड़कों के बीच बतायी है। उनकी एक सुंदर बेटी है जिसे बाबा खूब दुलार करते हैं। बाबा कभी-कभार उसके गालों को चूमते भी हैं। बाबा ने बताया कि इस तरह उनके बुढ़ापे की हड्डी में थोड़ी जान आ जाती है।

इस सिलसिले में यदि मैं उनकी एक कॉलेज टीचर शिष्या के लिखित संस्मरण का यह छोटा टुकड़ा यहां पैबश्त कर दूं तो मेरी समझ से यह प्रसंग और गाढ़ा और प्रामाणिक हो जायेगा। (नागार्जुन नहछू, सविता भार्गव, नया पथ, जनवरी-जून, 2011)

“अरे, तुम तो मेरी अपनी हो। यह कहते हुए बाबा मेरे गालों पर हाथ फेरते हुए मेरा हाथ अपने हाथ में ले लिया। बाबा ने कभी लड़कियों को डांटा-फटकारा हो, यह मुझे याद नहीं। अलबत्ता लड़कियां तो उन्हें प्यारी ही लगती थीं। उन पर विशेष तौर पर उनका लाड बरसता था। एक बार ऐसा ही कुछ नज़ारा उपस्थित हुआ। दोपहर के भोजन के बाद बाबा ने लेटते हुए कहा कि अब हम सोयेंगे। किसी से नहीं मिलाना। दरवाज़ा बंद कर दीजिए।

बाबा को लेटे अभी आध-पौन घंटा बिता होगा कि दरवाज़े पर दस्तक हुई। मेरे ही कॉलेज की छात्राएं थीं। बाबा से मिलना चाह रही थीं। मैंने उन्हें शाम में आने को कहकर दरवाज़ा बंद कर दिया। इसी बीच बाबा तखत पर उठ बैठे और बोले, कौन है भाई। अरे उन्हें बुलाओ।

बाबा आप ही ने तो कहा था कि…

अरे भई, लड़कियों को थोड़े ही मना किया था। जाओ आवाज़ दो उन्हें।

(हां-हां क्यों नहीं। अभी कोई और होता तो बुढउ भिनभिना जाते।) मैं मन ही मन बुदबुदाई। ‘बुढउ’ की संज्ञा बाबा के छोटे बेटे श्यामाकांत की ही दी हुई थी। अक्सर मैं और श्यामाकांत बाबा के इस पक्षपात पर मज़ा लेते हुए टिप्पणी किया करते थे।

अरे, बुढउ को कम मत समझो। अभी उनका दिल जवान है, श्यामाकांत हंसकर कहते।

आज बाबा का जनमदिन है। इस अवसर पर मेरे लिए बाबा के इस रूप को याद करने का एक खास प्रयोजन है। कोई भी बड़ा कवि या साहित्यकार चाहे वह ऊपर से कितना भी उज्जड्ड या खडूस क्यों न दिखे, भीतर से गहन रोमांटिक हुए और झक्कीपन लिये बिना अपनी ख्याति के शीर्ष पर पहुंच ही नहीं सकता। बाबा हमारे समय के एक ऐसे ही महान कवि हैं जिनकी आगे की कई पीढ़ियों तक ख्याति की दुदुंभी बजती रहेगी।

The post बाबा नागार्जुन: अभी उनका दिल जवान है! appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

DU vs Jamia vs JNU: Which Uni’s PG Entrance Exam Tests Your Aptitude Best?

$
0
0

The CBSE board exams suffer from the limitation of what I like to call the ‘objectivity of subjectivity’. A comprehensive set of questions are asked, but strict adherence to answer keys and the desire for ‘memorised text duplication’ on paper, sets the tone for absolutism. Thus, an antecedent for manufactured minds is set! CBSE results come as a matter of surprise and shock; arbitrariness reigns supreme and subjectivity is dethroned.

Apart from the CBSE board exams, the entrance examinations conducted by various universities involve, no doubt, massive logistical, management and evaluation considerations. And for this reason alone, any harsh criticism of their evaluation techniques would be misdirected, for they must be considered both a formative element and product of the structure that is our education economy. For a system of testing to be centralised, efficient and viable, objectivity itself becomes imperative. The Delhi University Master’s Entrance Exam is a case in point. In 2018, a student applying for the master’s course in History had to sit in front of a computer and answer 100 MCQs in two hours. It afforded incredible convenience to the students and the process of evaluation, resulting in faster results and virtually no hassle of manual labour.

Let’s compare this with the Jawaharlal Nehru University Master’s Entrance Examination (JNUEE). The same student applying for an M.A. in History in JNU has to write a 3-hour long paper, divided into three sections – a comprehensive attempt to assess the student’s understanding, knowledge and critical ability. For this year, JNU conducted the examination in December 2017, while most universities like DU conducted theirs in June 2018. It is easy to imagine the cumbersome and intensive process of evaluation that the university management has to face each year, along with the looming possibility of result delays. Subjectivity can invite bias based on ideology, vocabulary and other variables; objectivity, on the other hand, is promising within its binary of right or wrong.

However, an objective test is symptomatic of a ‘fact-based’ approach that limits assessment and the discipline, especially in the Arts, which thrives on multiplicity. In a sense, it can be said that JNU forsakes managerial convenience for qualitative testing and comprehensive evaluation. Anuj (name changed), a student who took the JNUEE in December 2017, says, “They basically let me decide the field (to some extent) on which I wanted myself to be judged. Their challenge for us was to show them how well our grasp of the topic really is.” JNUEE required the students to attempt at least one of the two questions in the third section from the field they wish to specialise in. The renown JNU enjoys is perhaps, in part, a result of this approach.

The Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI), in its entrance exam, has a refreshing combination of both objective- and subjective-type questions, distributed as 40 and 60 marks, respectively. This layout balances fact and ideology – an ideal balance to ascertain the overall skill and knowledge of the individual, without heavily relying on either.

Avijit Singh, formerly a student of Ramjas College took the DU, JMI and JNU entrance exams and said, “The DU paper was 100% objective. The questions were extremely difficult and painfully specific. There were also many glitches – like a question not having a proper answer in the options. Jamia’s exam, on the other hand, was 60% subjective and 40% objective. The subjective part was great. Had actual tangible questions discussing the rise of Gandhian politics and globalisation among other things that must have made the teachers aware of the acumen of the students they want in their university. The objective part was still very dicey. The JNU paper was subjective but slightly lengthy. I guess it had the best pattern out of the three.”

The National Eligibility Test (NET) is conducted by the University Grants Commission (UGC) to determine the eligibility for lectureship and for awarding the Junior Research Fellowship (JRF) to Indian nationals. A long-standing demand of teachers and students alike is for the paper, which is completely objective, to move to a subjective-type evaluation. This is cited as crucial in order to produce better teachers and improve the domain of knowledge-production in general. When an examination becomes an exercise in fact-checking, diversity caves and selection inefficiencies become rampant.

In the civilisational hunger for remuneration and climbing hierarchies, models of convenience flourish, even within centres of knowledge. Outlining the duality of objectivity-subjectivity at the threshold of such knowledge centres seems like an inconvenient point of contention. However, examinations can and must function as effective potential-detectors rather than being ceremonies or farces.

Which University's PG Entrance Exam Is The Best?

The post DU vs Jamia vs JNU: Which Uni’s PG Entrance Exam Tests Your Aptitude Best? appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.


What India Can Learn From Hannah Gadsby’s ‘Nanette’?

$
0
0

What is it that drives us? Probably, a great line for a hit movie. Live your dreams and follow your passion. A friend once sent me a video of some motivational speaker, probably self-appointed, who said that he didn’t care whether you are smart or dumb, strong or weak, rich or poor, if you want something, go and get it. That motivational speaker was a straight white man.

We live in a world that has vast pool of ideas but somehow they are widely distributed and wildly disorganised. There are so many initiatives that people want to take and people do take but they just don’t seem enough. And when they actually do start making something beneficial, they have to face administration, governance, rudimentary judiciary and social injustice. No matter how much you can ignore the facts but it is a reality that the world is not a great place for women, for the LGBTQ+ community and for any minority in major economies of the world. There is discrimination and we are not doing much about it.

The one important thing that led us to civilization and growth was our thinking. If we hadn’t thought of developing ourselves, we never would have. Today, that thinking is corrupted, polluted and radical against any progressive change. If you have any doubt over the narrow mindedness of today’s world, have a look at those who run the world’s biggest economies.

An orange haired man who is accused of harassment, who openly broadcasts his hate against the second largest religion of the world, and is cheered for doing so by people who are adamant on their idea of a great country is the President of the most powerful nation of the world. Another man, who has no orange hair but loves the colour in his attire, a childhood member of an organisation whose ideas, coincidentally, resonate with those of Hitler and Mussolini heads the fastest growing economy and the largest democracy of the modern world. It is interesting to note that he accused his predecessor of keeping his mouth shut and he himself never speaks against mob lynching against the people of the second largest religion in the world. One may wonder if he even recognises the acts of mob lynching, killings of journalists (who didn’t want govt. pay), abduction and rape of little girls (one reported to have occurred inside a temple), as crime or illegal activities. Though, he does speak a lot of black days of past and his struggle as a tea vendor during his early days. Many tea vendors still suffer the same but there is an army of true believers of this man’s, who was supposed to be accused of riots that occurred under his rule, vision of good days. If you would move towards north from the largest democracy and the most unsafe nation for women (according to Thomson Reuters), you’ll find the countries of Marx and Mao, where in name of socialism people don’t have a complete independence.

Today, I live in a country that is not safe for women and study among people who use ‘gay’ and ‘lesbian’ as an insult for the sake of their own amusement. I am unable to trust the media because somehow, almost all of them seem to support the ruling party and its saffron agenda. The leaders of the country who once were active student politicians today advocate jailing of students who protest peacefully in their own university campuses. There exists an army of online trolls who consider themselves as protectors of their holy religion and their motherland, and openly (for lack of a better word) bash every person who dares speak against the government. We consider a man who thought of caste system as a perfect thing to exist and believed that everyone should work according to their caste as father of our nation. They use the names of great leaders who fought for our independence as cover for their agendas of making India a Hindu Rashtra. The people who were chosen as public representative to the government openly support killers of liberal journalists and carry out rallies in support of rape accused (their excuse was that rape accused was a Hindu and the victim was a Muslim girl, her age of just 8 didn’t matter to them). But there is still hope.

Last night, I watched Hannah Gadsby’s Netflix special, “Nanette”. Towards the end of her set, she said something very important and fitting to today’s world. She said that anger, just like laughter is infectious and will spread like fire, and it was not her right to do so just because she can. Unfortunately, lately the leader of two important democracies of the world have leaders who have an army of blind supporters who are fuelled by anger against anyone they deem a threat to THEIR culture and THEIR country. It is everyone’s duty and most importantly of those who are privileged and do not have to face the atrocities of the society to understand the people around them and embrace our differences. If we could just embrace our differences and lend an ear to hear their stories, we will realize that we are not much different from one another. Rudimentary thinking about gender rigidity, patriarchal superiority, religious insecurities, and communal hatred are to be let go of.

We are a nation of 1.2 billion people. These people have their own personalities. Imagine, if people who have access to education actually spent time reading and understanding the struggles, the challenges and the adversities that are faced by different sects of the society, and then collectively work towards the betterment of it. The one lesson that we should learn from the history is that blind following of people with dangerous and violent mind-set has never resulted to any good and it never will. The basic essence of a democracy is to question. To raise doubt and suggest improvements. Today, even this fundamental factor of democracy is in danger.

India is not just a country (and this might sound pretentious, it isn’t though) but an idea. For years, we have taken pride in aphorisms of our unity in diversities, of embracing our differences and loving everyone without any malice. Somewhere down the line, we lost the meaning of this and protests became acts of sedition and patriotism became nationalism and dissent became anti – nationalism. I would recommend everyone to watch “Nanette” as it speaks of feminism, the malice of homophobia, the struggles of minorities in a much different perspective, and when you’re done watching it, spend some time reading about the struggles of all the minorities which still ‘dare’ to exist in our country which seems to be driven on its way to madness and chaos. Try to understand things from perspectives that are not yours and if you’re unable to do so, ask someone to help. People will always tell you their story if you’ll lend them an ear.

When I was a child, during morning assemblies we sang in chorus, “… Mazhab nahi sikhaata, aapas me bair karna…. Saare Jahaan se achcha, Hindustaan Hamaara…”. Its high time that we start believing in it as well.

The post What India Can Learn From Hannah Gadsby’s ‘Nanette’? appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

बाबा की गुड ब्वॉय इमेज गढ़ने की अच्छी कोशिश है फिल्म संजू

$
0
0

‘जब तुम और सत्य मुझसे बातें करते हैं तो मैं सत्य की नहीं सुनता, तुम्हारी सुनता हूं।’
– अंतोनियो पोर्चिया

फिल्म ‘संजू’ पोर्चिया के इस कथन का विस्तार है। सिनेमाहॉल में हम संजय दत्त की बातें सुन रहे हैं। एक इंसान ड्रग एडिक्ट हो सकता है, अपराधी हो सकता है, हत्यारा हो सकता है, रेपिस्ट हो सकता है- पर हर इंसान की तरह सारी घटनाओं का उसका अपना वर्जन होगा, जिसे वो सुनाएगा। कुछ सुनाएगा, कुछ छुपायेगा।

ये सच भी हो सकता है, ये सच्चाई से भागकर बनी फंतासी भी हो सकती है। ये भी हो सकता है कि वो इंसान अपनी क्रूर सच्चाई से भली-भांति अवगत हो, वो जानता हो कि वो कितना भयावह इंसान है, पर ये भी हो सकता है कि वो एक बार खुद को एक इंसान के तौर पर देखना चाहता हो, कहानी में ही सही। और जब वो इंसान किशोरावस्था में ही ड्रग एडिक्ट बन जाता है तो उसकी कहानी ध्यान से सुननी चाहिए, चाहे हम उसे सच मानें या झूठ। क्योंकि इस आधी-अधूरी/पूरी/सच्ची-झूठी कहानी से बहुत कुछ सीखा-समझा जा सकता है।

‘संजू’ के केंद्र में है बाप-बेटे का रिश्ता। एक परंपरागत मॉरलिस्ट बाप जिसने जीवन के हर क्षेत्र में नाम कमाया है। एक बेटा जो बाप की हर कही बात को खुद से तुलना समझ लेता है और हर बार बाप के सामने छोटा निकलता है। वो जबर्दस्ती बोर्डिंग स्कूल भेजा हुआ लड़का है, वो सिगरेट पीने पर डांट खाया हुआ लड़का है। जो अपने जीवन में की गयी हर गलती को बोर्डिंग स्कूल पर मढ़ देगा। ये लड़का 50 साल का होने पर भी जीवन की सबसे बड़ी ख्वाहिश रखता है कि सबके सामने अपने बाप को लिखा हुआ लेटर पढ़ के सुनाये।

इसकी लाइफ की सबसे बड़ी ट्रैजेडी यही है कि ये लड़का अपने बाप के मरने के बाद ही बड़ा हो पाता है। शादी निभाता है, बच्चों की ज़िम्मेदारी लेता है। अपना काम सही से करता है, अपने अपराधों से मुक्ति पाता है। वरना इससे पहले वो eat, drink, fornicate की फिलॉसफी रखता है, क्योंकि उसे बोर्डिंग स्कूल भेजा गया था।

सुनील दत्त का कैरेक्टर बहुत अच्छा लिखा गया है। परेश रावल ने बहुत अच्छा निभाया भी है। ये कैरेक्टर भी संजू बाबा की निगाह से ही लिखा गया है, इस कैरेक्टर में कोई फ्लॉ नहीं है, परफेक्ट इंसान। रणबीर कपूर ने ठीक-ठाक अभिनय किया है। डांस का सीन आते ही वो रणबीर कपूर बन जाते हैं, संजय दत्त की तरह डांस नहीं करते। ये चीज़ मिस हो गयी डायरेक्टर से।

फिल्म में मेलोड्रामा लेकर आते हैं विकी कौशल। संजय दत्त के कई दोस्तों की आत्मायें इस कैरेक्टर में डाली गयी हैं। शायद इसीलिए अच्छी एक्टिंग के बावजूद विकी हर जगह ड्रामा ही करते नज़र आते हैं। हद तब होती है जब वो फिल्म के आखिर में 30 साल पुरानी ‘दोस्ती की जैकेट’ पहने खड़े हो जाते हैं। कहीं-कहीं ये भी लगता है कि विकी का कैरेक्टर संजय दत्त के जीवन में मौजूद नशे का कैरेक्टर है। एक हैल्यूसिनेशन, जिसे संजय अपनी फंतासी में जीते हैं।

फिल्म के एक सीन में विकी कौशल

फिर ‘मुन्नाभाई mbbs’ के साथ शुरू हुआ बोमन ईरानी और संजय दत्त का रिश्ता इस फिल्म में भी है। ये पता ही नहीं चल पाता कि ये सीन मुन्नाभाई सीरीज से लिए गए हैं या रियल लाइफ से। ये भी नहीं समझ आता कि इस सीन को सेक्स कॉमेडी बनाने की क्या ज़रूरत थी? यहाँ राजू हिरानी गुजराती-पारसी के बॉलीवुड कैरीकेचर से आगे नहीं बढ़ पाते हैं।

वहीं सोनम कपूर का कैरेक्टर संजू को ‘निर्दोष जालिम’ साबित करने में लगा रहता है। अपने आखिरी सीन में सोनम 70’s की फिल्मों के डायलॉग बोल के जाती हैं। यही काम मनीषा कोइराला भी करती हैं। नरगिस दत्त का कैरेक्टर और अच्छा लिखा जा सकता था। संजय जिस इंटेंसिटी से अपनी मां का ज़िक्र करते हैं, उसे छोड़ इसे ओवर ड्रामैटिक बना दिया गया है।

विडंबना है पियूष मिश्रा का कैरेक्टर। रियल लाइफ में ‘साला भगत सिंह’ कहते हुए पियूष ने खुद को भगत सिंह का सबसे बड़ा फैन बना लिया है। वहीं फिल्म में महात्मा गांधी और संजू बाबा की बड़ाई करते वो बुरी तरह बेइज्ज़त होते हैं। भगत सिंह और गांधीजी के फैंस की राइवलरी चलती है देश में। पलड़ा नहीं बदलना चाहिए था।

यहां ये बात ध्यान देने लायक है कि ‘लगे रहो मुन्नाभाई’ से गांधीगिरी की शुरुआत कर संजय की छवि खूब चमकाई गयी थी। कोर्ट की दलीलों में भी इसे मेंशन किया गया था। पर फिल्म के शुरुआत में ही संजू बाबा, गांधी के साथ तुलना पर हम्बल हो जाते हैं। ये रील और रियल का फर्क है।

फिल्म में संजय के जीवन की दो महत्वपूर्ण घटनाओं का ही ज़िक्र है- ड्रग एडिक्शन और 1993 का बम ब्लास्ट। ड्रग वाले पार्ट को अच्छा दिखाया गया है। इसमें वो अपनी गलती मानते हैं और उससे उबर जाते हैं। संजू बाबा को अब टेड टॉक्स में ड्रग के ऊपर बोलने के लिए बुलाया जाना चाहिए। पर बम ब्लास्ट के मामले में एक साइड ही दिखाई गयी है, दूसरी साइड मीडिया सालों से दिखा रही है।

फिल्म में ड्रग एडिक्शन का एक सीन

वो बम ब्लास्ट पेचीदा था भी, मुम्बई को अपनी महबूबा कहनेवाले दाऊद ने ब्लास्ट कराया था। ये आतंकवाद का अभिनव रूप था। हो सकता है कि संजय को इसके बारे में उस वक्त ना पता हो, पर आपराधिक लोगों के साथ उठना-बैठना तो चल ही रहा था। इसे डिफेंड करने के लिए और इंटेंस कहानी चाहिए।

सुकेतु मेहता की लिखी ‘मैक्सिमम सिटी’ की निराशाजनक बातों के बिलकुल विपरीत संजय इस फिल्म के माध्यम से अपने जीवन की पॉजिटिविटी को रखते हैं कि मुझसे गलती हुई थी, मानता हूं पर मैं आतंकवादी नहीं था, मुझे मालूम ही नहीं था। ये बात हो सकती है क्योंकि संजय देश छोड़कर भाग भी सकते थे, भागे नहीं। राजू हिरानी ने इस चीज़ को बहुत अच्छे से दिखाया है। वो अपनी फिल्मों में हर बात हंसते खेलते कह जाते हैं।

संजय के जीवन के कुछ हिस्से नहीं दिखाये गए हैं, जिनमें जनता को दिलचस्पी हो सकती थी। उनके ‘लव अफेयर्स’ और दो शादियां और फिर मान्यता दत्त से शादी के बाद बदली ज़िंदगी। सुनील दत्त के बाद मान्यता ने ही संजय को सबसे ज्यादा संभाला है। मान्यता से शादी होने पर संजय की बहनें भी नाराज़ थीं। खबर थी कि मान्यता की वजह से ही संजू-सलमान की लड़ाई हुई थी। बेटी त्रिशला का भी कोई ज़िक्र नहीं है। शायद तीन घंटे में इसकी जगह नहीं थी।

फिर माफिया के साथ संबंधों को बहुत लाइटली दिखाया गया है। बॉलीवुड यहां पर मुम्बई माफिया और ग्लैमर को अलग नहीं कर पाता। फिल्म में सुनील दत्त जिस तरीके से गैंगस्टर हाजी मस्तान का ज़िक्र करते हैं, डर लगने लगता है कि कहीं उनकी फाइल भी ना खुल जाए। माफिया के मामले में बॉलीवुड रील और रियल में फर्क नहीं कर पाता।

फिल्म में सल्लू भाई को कहीं नहीं दिखाया गया है। बिना भाई के बाबा की बॉयोपिक कैसे?

एक बात अच्छी नहीं लगी, औरतों को लेकर फिल्म की फिलॉसफी खराब है। जैसे ड्रग के बारे में बात की, पछतावा किया, वैसे ही लड़कियों के प्रति भी विचार बदलने चाहिए थे। शायद बाबा ने सीखा नहीं है अभी तक, इसके लिए एक और फिल्म बनानी पड़ेगी।

अगर कुछ चीजों को इग्नोर करें तो ‘संजू’ मनोरंजक फिल्म है। राजू हिरानी ने बड़ी चालाकी से संजय का वर्जन कहने के लिए बॉयोग्राफी राइटिंग को ही कहानी का माध्यम चुना है। क्योंकि फिल्म इंडिपेंडेंट रिसर्च से बनी नहीं है, संजू के श्रीमुख से ही निकली है।

सबसे अलग है फिल्म के अंत में बाबा का आइटम सॉन्ग। 2017 के वर्ड ‘फेक न्यूज़’ को लेकर 1993 की घटनाओं को समझाया है बाबा ने। संजू बाबा पूरे स्वैग में हैं इस गाने में। बात सही कहते हैं पर गाली मां की ही देते हैं पत्रकारों को।

*पोर्चिया का कथन ‘सदानीरा’ मैगज़ीन के ग्रीष्म 2018 अंक में पढ़ा था।

The post बाबा की गुड ब्वॉय इमेज गढ़ने की अच्छी कोशिश है फिल्म संजू appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

Why It’s Sheer Hypocrisy On Part Of The US To Complain About ‘Migrants’

$
0
0

The ongoing immigration crisis knocking the door of the developed world is the second biggest crisis after the world wars. The last three decades of persistent war played out between the ‘civilisational forces’ of the west in the arena of west Asia has destroyed many countries. Millions of people have died and a sea of humanity has been left destitute.

The right-wing forces in the developed world, from Europe to America to East Asia, have found in this crisis a political opportunity. Call for heightened protectionism and sealing of borders are being made from electoral rallies. The victory of right-wing forces across the world in elections held in the past few years has reduced the chances of the crisis settling down.

If anything, the US policy that created a lot of furore, providing for separation of children from their family members at its border check posts with Mexico in order to create a deterrence for illegal migration is only the signs of the times to come.

It goes to show the power of human rights activists and the media that within two months after the policy was signed, it was revoked. But going by the news reports, much damage has already been done. Several families who got separated from their children may never meet again. The visuals and audio of children as young as three-month-old being kept in cages at child detention centres serve as eery reminders of the Holocaust. With the fear of losing a Republican majority in Congress that could set the ball rolling for Trump’s impeachment, the hyper-nationalism trumpet is not expected to die soon.

Migration is indispensable to human existence. It has the effect of replenishing human ingenuity. Since man was a primitive nomad, his needs have kept him on the move. The earliest homo sapiens were hunter-gatherers who went after their prey from place to place. As man discovered farming, the mechanism of shifting cultivation made him migrate to more fertile lands. After the more basic needs of food and shelter were secured, his curiosity about the world made him cross unfamiliar territories. He led expeditions for months through rough weather in search of new land and to test his traditional understanding about cosmology and geography. Thus, were born the Marco Polo, Columbus and Vasco da Gama of the world.

After repeated forays through the highs and lows of seas, he became a professional voyager. The richness of the discovered land made him establish trade ties with people he met. Curiosity followed trade. Trade accompanied intellectual exchange. The knowledge of the west met that of the east and vice versa. No wonder all the noted travellers of the past were considered philosophers in their own right. Their records made during their eventful journeys are amongst the earliest documentation of human knowledge. Megasthenes, Fahien, Huen Tsang, Ibn Battuta, Ibn Khaldun and numerous other philosophers through their scholarship provided an intellectual continuity from past to present. They left for us reservoirs of knowledge that hems through all the modern streams like arts, science, literature and philosophy.

Their works provide insight about the societies they paid visits to and cultures they came across. Travelling invariably was the only source of knowledge known to ancient man. It was said that must you travel to far off places like China for education. The knowledge of the east was highly regarded throughout the world. Ancient Indian seats of learning Nalanda, Takshila and Vikramshila were famous for their cosmopolitan outlook. Students from across the world sought universal education without having to face any institutional discrimination.

In the more recent history, the social churnings in Europe that started many a revolution and led to the foundation of modern-day societies were also inspired by the cross-cultural exchange. The same forces of migration that initially led to the subjugation of natives came into play to offer a strong resistance. The colonial history is replete with examples of writers, poets and barristers from across the colonies who came together to offer an intellectual critique of imperialism.

Gandhi’s African experience of struggle against apartheid was critical in shaping his resolve to fight colonialism. His travels across the length and breadth of the country in the first two years after returning to India familiarized him to specifics of colonial oppression. It was the same with Che Guevera, the Marxist revolutionary who travelled to far off places to understand the state of the countryside.

Apart from facilitating human subsistence, trade and commerce and intellectual exchange, migration was vital in the spread of religious ideologies. All the organised faiths that we practice today spread across the world thanks to the wandering seers and Sufis. The khanqahs that many such Sufis started in India stand till date as the true testament of humanity and brotherhood.

There is a verse in the Quran that talks about Fazeelat (success) in Safar (travel). Prophet Mohammad migrated from Mecca to Madinah (the event is called Hijrat (migration) and marks the beginning of the Hijri calendar, one which Muslims across the world follow) which saw the reversal of his fortunes. The idea of the world being a family was consistent in all religions of the time.

Vasudev Kutumbakam is oft-cited from Upanishads, a sacred book in Hinduism, to emphasise the virtues of universal brotherhood. The same was extolled by the faiths of Islam, Christianity and Judaism.

Buddhism and Jainism that came up against the Brahmanical hegemony also advocated for the equality of man and love and affection for the entire world. Interestingly, this was the only spirit that ran common even among the non-believers of faith.

Once the more basic physiological and the intellectual needs were fulfilled, man became expansionist. In most cases, this was necessitated by his rising stock as was the case with the central Asian tribes. But this was not always the case. Equally powerful was his greed to be the ruler of territories where once he used to travel. The voyagers became conquerors and were soon followed by settlers. Europeans who had the early advantage of being proficient in sea trade became the dominant forces of loot and plunder. They split the world along the Papal line to carry on with their business of establishing global domination. What followed were indiscriminate wars between the native tribes and the invading forces.

The erosion of indigenous culture was the first most significant casualty, at the receiving end of which were the Native Americans in the west who inhabited the land mass across the Atlantic, the African tribes in the south and the Asian subcontinent in the east. The earliest settlers in North America were Europeans. They pushed the indigenous tribes to the deserts in the west from the most strategically located eastern coast. The injustice could be gauged from the fact that the Atlantic seaboard is amongst the most developed regions of the world today and the regions the natives inhabit amongst the most backward of places in America.

They advanced the practice of slavery in Africa to use them as labourers in their cotton plantations and to build railway lines to the nearest cities and ports.

It’s sheer thuggery when the white supremacists in the United States of America boastfully accuse the Mexicans and Columbians of being illegal immigrants. The Indian subcontinent had already been witness to earlier rounds of migration. In a historic judgement delivered in 2011, Justice Markandeya Katju said, “India is broadly a country of immigrants, like North America… Over 92% of the people living in India are not the original inhabitants of India…The difference between North America and India is that North America is a country of new immigrants, where people came mainly from Europe over the last four to five hundred years, India is a country of old immigrants where people have been coming in for 10 thousand years or so.”

The indigenous tribes or the original inhabitants across the world have been universally classified as the common heritage of mankind. Yet it’s an irony that their struggle for recognition is lost in the din. The point is that humanity predates the idea of modern nation states. The story of human mobility is the history of humanity itself. Geographical boundaries of mountains, seas, valleys and deserts that naturally delimit parcels of land were the only check posts known to the ancient man. Right from being hunter-gatherers till the time this journey was about an intellectual exchange, man crossed these boundaries without fear or favour.

In his quest to organise people as nations, man delimited geography. But, for his cunning behaviour, he failed to preserve its sanctity. The state tried to instil in its people a sense of pride that came at the cost of hatred and animosity for others. It was a tacit attempt at curtailing the wisdom man had acquired over thousands of years that had made him humble about his own place in the world. The nations failed in ensuring dignified means of livelihood, equal distribution of resources and a just and liberal society.

This became the catalyst for another wave of migration. After the discovery of oil fields, west Asia became the centre of migration for people from the subcontinent. The massive development projects that transformed the Arabian desert to concrete blocks and shining steel structures were made possible by the subcontinent’s labourers.

Syrian refugees

The injustice meted out at the hands of the state through targeted acts like genocide and ethnic cleansing, mindless wars with invisible enemies and an imported idea of development left millions of people internally displaced and mass exodus from regions of conflict. Several others perished while trying to escape through the sea routes. Those who could afford to went into exile.

Migration came to be seen as the only ray of hope for the people in war zones, while the nations they were headed to saw them as a security threat. These same nations, however, were behind this prevailing crisis.

The post Why It’s Sheer Hypocrisy On Part Of The US To Complain About ‘Migrants’ appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

“मेरे दोस्त के घर वालों को लगा मैं चमार हूं इसलिए मुझे गंदे ग्लास में चाय दी गई”

$
0
0

हिन्दुस्तान में अलग-अलग धर्म व संप्रदाय के लोग विभिन्न इलाकों में अपनी परंपराओं के रंग बिखेरते हुए ज़िन्दगी की हसीन राहों पर सफर तय किए जा रहे हैं। भले ही इनके मज़हब अलग हैं, लेकिन त्यौहारों के मौसम में अलग-अलग समुदाय के लोगों को एक दूसरे के रिवाज़ों को देखने और समझने का अवसर प्राप्त होता है। कई मौके ऐसे भी आते हैं जब हिन्दुस्तान की परंपराएं और यहां की खूबसूरती के बीच जातिवाद हावी हो जाता है। वहीं पुरानी घिसी-पिटी बातें सामने आती हैं कि यदि कोई व्यक्ति छोटी जाति से है, तो उसे ब्राह्मण के घर चौखट लांघने की इजाज़त नहीं होती है वगैरह-वगैरह। कुछ ऐसा ही वाक्या अभी हाल ही में मेरे साथ घटित हुआ जिसे बताने से पहले मैं राष्ट्रकवि रामधारी सिंह दिनकर जी की कविता की एक पंक्ति पढ़ना चाहूंगा।

ऊंच-नीच का भेद न माने, वही श्रेष्ठ ज्ञानी है,

दया-धर्म जिसमें हो, सबसे वही पूज्य प्राणी है।

क्षत्रिय वही, भरी हो जिसमें निर्भयता की आग

सबसे श्रेष्ठ वही ब्राह्मण है, हो जिसमें तप-त्याग।

हालांकि इन दिनों देशभर में जाति के आधार पर हो रहे भेदभाव के बीच दिनकर की इस पंक्ति की सार्थकता नहीं दिख रही है। मेरे हालिया अनुभव ने खासतौर पर इस बात को और बल दे दिया है। अभी हाल ही में एक मित्र के साथ मैं उसके ऑफिस की एक कलीग के घर गया था। वैसे उनकी फैमिली वालों या वाणी से मैं उतना फ्रैंक नहीं था तो इस लिहाज़ से भी मैं उनके घर के बाहर ही खड़ा था और मेरा मित्र अंदर प्रवेश कर चुका था। मैं उनके घर के बाहर इंतज़ार कर ही रहा था कि इतने में मेरे मित्र की कलीग वाणी मंडल के पति बाहर आकर मुझसे अंदर आने को कहते हैं।

मुझे आभास हुआ कि अंदर रसोई घर में चाय बन रही थी, तभी वाणी आकर मुझसे पूछती है कि आप चाय लेंगे? वैसे भी चाय का बहुत आशिक हूं। मेरा मानना है कि यदि हम चुस्कियां लेकर मज़े से चाय पीएं तब ज़िन्दगी को और करीब से देखने का मज़ा ही कुछ और होता है।

खैर, चाय बन चुकी थी और एक ट्रे में तीन चाय लेकर वाणी उस कमरे में आती हैं जहां हम बैठे थे। जिसमें से दो चाय ‘कप’ में और एक ‘कांच की गंदी सी ग्लास’ में थी और वह चाय की ग्लास मुझे ही दी गई। जो अन्य दो कप थे उनमें वाणी और मेरा मित्र चाय पी रहा था। सच बताऊं तो पहले कभी इन चीज़ों से मेरा वास्ता पड़ा नहीं, तो इसलिए एक दफा दिमाग में स्ट्राइक किया भी कि ऐसा क्यों? पर मैं कांच की ग्लास में मुझे चाय देने वाली बात को भूल जाना चाहता था। कुछ पल में हम लोगों की बातें खत्म हुईं और हम वहां से निकल पड़े।

मैं रात को अपने मित्र को फोन लगाया और कहा कि ज़रा पूछिएगा आप अपने कलीग से कि मुझे कांच की ग्लास में क्यों चाय दी गई। और उसने ये बात वाणी से पूछ ली। वाणी का जो जवाब था उसे सुनकर मैं न सिर्फ हैरान रह गया बल्कि इस देश में जाति के आधार पर हो रहे भेदभाव और नफरत को इतने करीब से देखकर काफी दुखी भी हुआ।

मेरी परवरिश एक ऐसे माहौल में हुई है जहां ब्राह्मण होते हुए भी मुझे कभी ये संस्कार नहीं दिए गए कि ‘छोटी’ जाति वाले लोगों के यहां पानी नहीं पीनी है या उनके घर आने पर उनका सत्कार नहीं करना है। मैं हमेशा से ही ग्रामीण इलाकों में सभी जाति के घर जाकर भोजन करता रहता हूं, बड़ा आनंद आता है। लेकिन वाणी ने जो बातें जातिवाद को लेकर मेरे संदर्भ में कही, वो बेहद ही चौंकाने वाली हैं।

मेरे मित्र ने मुझे बताया कि वाणी कह रही थी,

हां मैंने जान बुझकर प्रिंस को कांच की ग्लास में चाय दी थी, क्योंकि मुझे पता है वो चमार है। इतना काला आदमी चमार ही हो सकता है। मैंने वो कांच की ग्लास अपने घर में इसलिए ही रखी है ताकि जब भी कोई चमार या शेड्यूल ट्राइब मेरे यहां आएं तब मैं उन्हें उसी ग्लास में चाय दे सकूं।

हालांकि मेरे मित्र ने उसे कई दफा कहा कि मैं प्रिंस के बारे में सब कुछ जानता हूं कि वह ब्राह्मण है, लेकिन वाणी मानने को तौयार ही नहीं थी।

ये सारी बातें सुनने के बाद मैं काफी दुखी तो हुआ ही मगर दलितों के साथ इस देश में हो रहे भेदभाव को पहली दफा महसूस करके उनके बोझिल कंधों की तकलीफों को समझ भी पाया। ये जान पाया कि जब कोई दलित किसी तथाकथित फॉरवर्ड कास्ट के घर जाता है और उसके साथ ऐसा सुलूक होता है, तब उनपर न जानें क्या गुज़रती होगी।

इसमें कोई दो राय नहीं है कि भारत देश धीरे-धीरे ही सही मगर तरक्की की राह पर आगे बढ़ रहा है, मगर जाति और धर्म के आधार पर देश को दो भागों में बांटने की बातें करने वाले कुछ लोग तरक्की की इस रफ्तार को धीमी कर देते हैं। इस देश में वाणी जैसी महिलाएं और पुरूषों की अपार संख्या है जो आज भी जाति के आधार पर भेदभाव करते हैं। ये वो लोग होते हैं जो ज़िन्दगी और मौत के बीच जूझते वक्त ये नहीं देखते कि खून देने वाला व्यक्ति दलित है या कोई ब्राह्मण। तब इनके ज़हन में कांच की ग्लास में दलितों को चाय पिलाने वाली फीलिंग हिलोरे नहीं मारती है।

सिर्फ एक समुदाय के लोगों को लेकर देश महान नहीं बन सकता, जाति-धर्म और संप्रदाय की दीवारों को तोड़कर इस देश को तरक्की की राह पर आगे बढ़ाने का संकल्प सभी को मिलकर लेना होगा।

The post “मेरे दोस्त के घर वालों को लगा मैं चमार हूं इसलिए मुझे गंदे ग्लास में चाय दी गई” appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

Gender Equality In The Indian Workplace Is Not Possible Without Gender Equality In Society

$
0
0

By Sohini Bhattacharya:

Auratein kam karti hain to purushon ko lagta hai ki unki shaan kam ho jaygi aur parivar ki maryada khatm ho jayega”  (When women go out to work, men think their pride and their family’s honour will be destroyed).

The statement above was a response to a formative research exercise that Partners in Change carried out in June 2017, to inform Breakthrough’s intervention in the garment sector in Faridabad, Haryana. The research exercise was aimed at creating an enabling environment for women workers in the garment sector.

It’s a well-known fact that women’s workforce participation in India has been sliding rapidly. In 2004-05, the share of working-age women in paid jobs was 43%- the same as in 1993-94. This dropped to 27% in 2015-16*.  In rural India, the slide has been much worse as women’s contribution to agricultural work is largely invisible and the sector has not generated employment for women formally.

India was ranked 108 among 144 countries on the economic participation and opportunities index in the Global Gender Report 2017.

Another report that is still in progress reports the percentage of women in the workforce across the city of Delhi as just 13%; if this is the situation in one of the largest metropolitan cities of the world, clearly something is terribly wrong somewhere.

Women's labour force participation

The gender gap in the labour force is rooted in challenges that working women across the world face, including juggling work and family responsibilities, sexism at the workplace, unequal wage and unsafe work environments, lack of crèche and other facilities at work, and so on.

While all of these reasons are important to address, the scenario also needs to be studied from the viewpoint of the traditional roles women have played in society for centuries and the patriarchal mindsets at play in India.

“Gender equality in work is not possible without gender equality in society.”

The McKinsey Global Institute Report – The Power of Parity, on how gender inequality affects GDP and the economy of India, links, for the first time, gender equality in work with gender equality in society, saying that “The former is not possible without the latter”.

“When jobs are scarce, men should have more right to a job than women.”

“When a mother works for pay, the children suffer.”

Reactions like these bring home the point that mindsets at work and home for women are intrinsically linked and that promoting positive gender relations in the workplace and within families together can lead to improving the rights and lives of women workers. In other words, gender attitudes inform society’s reaction to a working woman.

Related article: Financial inclusion: The key to closing India’s gender gap

Women’s mobility and family honour

The formative research mentioned earlier points out how women’s mobility is closely linked to their ‘honour,’ rather than their earning power or their ability to hold a position in a competitive work arena.

This view enables households and families to exercise greater control over women. For instance, respondents to the research said that because of this link to ‘honour’, they face a number of restrictions on how to behave, how to dress, whom to speak to and whom to not speak to, when they step outside the house.

As many respondents shared, their families feel that “Once a woman starts working and earns money, she doesn’t have to depend on her husband and will take her own decisions in a small way. Gradually, the man will start losing control over her”.

Neighbours, too, ask questions – why is your daughter-in-law coming home so late? Who is the man she was talking to in the market? And families must constantly face such queries, steeped in the norms that the community follows. This—neighbourly interference—becomes another form of control over women.

women workforce participation
Photo courtesy: Charlotte Anderson

During the street theatre shows that we at Breakthrough organise for these women on issues they face at home and at work, women acknowledge that many instances of domestic violence are triggered by the idea that men are unable to accept their wife’s newfound mobility.

While domestic violence is common even among women who do not go to work, the increased mobility is an additional reason for the violence. In a patriarchal setup, roles are clearly demarcated. So if a woman steps out of the home leaving her daily household duties behind, a disruption is bound to happen. For instance, women might ask their husbands to contribute, however little, in domestic chores. This is clearly viewed as not respecting the husband who is used to having his every whim and fancy catered to. The in-laws find it unacceptable too.

Related article: We need to talk about men

Connected to the whole question of honour and control, is the masculine construct of men being the main breadwinner in the family. A Breakthrough  campaign on masculinity in 2016-17 spoke with more than 3000 men in Haryana about their wives stepping out of the home to work. We continue to use the campaign messages with the communities in Haryana and other parts of the country.

Men clearly linked this with honour – “Kya mein itna kamzor ho gya hoon, ki mera aurat ko ab kam karne nikalna parega?” (Am I so enfeebled that my woman has to now step out to work?). Many men feel their masculinity is being questioned if the women in the family step out of home to work.

Along with promoting inclusive workplaces and transforming gender relations within the workplace, empowering women workers to access their rights and advocating for behaviour change across the supply chain, there is an inherent need to address gender justice within families. We must also enable communities to look at working women with respect. One without the other will be like leaving a glass only half full.

About the author: CEO of Breakthrough, Sohini is a social change enthusiast who has 25+ years of experience in the social sector. Prior to Breakthrough, she co-founded a gender resource centre; worked directly with grassroots communities and built market-artisan interfaces for a national NGO. Sohini spent 10 years at Ashoka Innovators for the Public, and also worked as the India Strategy consultant at the Asian Venture Philanthropy Network for its crucial first three years of launch. She is a founding trustee of Read India, and a board member of Dastkar, Kolkata Sanved, and Aakar Social Ventures.

This article was originally published on India Development Review. You can view it here.

The post Gender Equality In The Indian Workplace Is Not Possible Without Gender Equality In Society appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

राजू हिरानी की सबसे खराब फिल्मों में गिनी जाएगी ‘संजू’

$
0
0

राजू भाई फिल्म बनाकर संजय दत्त के साथ दोस्ती निभानी थी तो दत्त साहब यानि सुनील दत्त जी पर भी बनाई जा सकती थी। ये पिता पुत्र की केमेस्ट्री तो उनके जरिए भी दिखा सकते थे। रणबीर और विक्की की एक्टिंग को छोड़कर फिल्म में कुछ भी बेहतर नहीं है। परेश रावल टाइप्ड कैरेक्टर ज़्यादा लग रहे हैं। परेश रावल, दत्त साहब के किरदार के साथ न्याय नहीं कर पाये। विक्की कौशल दिन ब दिन बेहतर होते जा रहे हैं । वे अपने काम मे विविधता के साथ न्याय करने में सफल हैं और इस फिल्म में भी बहुत बेहतर काम किया है । मेरे ख्याल रणबीर से भी बेहतर क्योंकि संजय जैसा बनने के चक्कर मे कहीं-कहीं रणबीर, कैरेक्टर को खराब कर गए हैं। जहां नैचुरल एक्टिंग है वहां बहुत गजब है।

इस फिल्म में महिला किरदारों के लिए कुछ खास नहीं है और सिवाय मनीषा कोइराला के किसी की भी एक्टिंग सराही नहीं जा सकती। मेरे ख्याल से यह फिल्म सोनम कपूर की सबसे खराब एक्टिंग वाली फिल्मों में गिनी जाएगी। अनुष्का शर्मा किसी भी संवाद से लेखिका नहीं लगती खैर ये गड़बड़ तो फिल्म लेखक की है लेकिन अनुष्का ने बहुत ही औसत काम किया है। दिया मिर्ज़ा का किरदार सिवाए शोपीस होने के अलावा कुछ नहीं है और माथे पर बार-बार त्यौरियों लाने के अलावा उन्हें ना कोई और काम दिया गया है और ना ही वे उस किरदार में कोई जान फूंक पाने में कामयाब हुई हैं ।

अगर फिल्म की कहानी की बात करें तो फिल्म संजय दत्त की ज़िंदगी को बड़ी ही चालाकी से सेलेक्टेड तरीके से दिखाती है। यथार्थ से कोसो दूर है। राजू हिरानी और जोशी ने फिल्म लिखने से पहले संजय दत्त से ठीक से कहानी सुनी नहीं लगता है। फिल्म संजय की जिंदगी के अलग अलग कॉन्ट्रोवर्शियल पहलुओं के दौरान उसके परिवार के साथ उसके सम्बन्धों को दिखाती है। बेशक पिता पुत्र के रिश्ते के विभिन्न आयाम खोलती है और माँ के साथ संवेदनशील रिश्ते को भी दिखाती है लेकिन संजय का बाकी परिवार नजरअंदाज़ कर दिया गया है। फिल्म से संजय की पूर्व पत्नियों का हिस्सा पूरा ही गायब है जबकि वो उसकी जिंदगी के सबसे महत्वपूर्ण मोड़ (1987 से 2005 तक) का हिस्सा थी।

राजू हिरानी ने दोस्ती के चक्कर मे मान्यता के किरदार को सुनील दत्त के बाद सबसे अधिक सपोर्टिव दिखाया है। जबकि प्रिया दत्त और नम्रता का हिस्सा लगभग पूरा ही गायब है। हालांकि कहीं-कहीं उनके किरदार आते ज़रूर हैं पर सिर्फ मौन। नरगिस का संजय की लाइफ में जितना अहम हिस्सा शुरुआत में दिखाया है वह फिल्म के दूसरे हिस्से में पूरी तरह से गायब है कहीं ज़िक्र भी नहीं।

मेरे ख्याल दत्त साहब की इमेज इस फिल्म में दिखाई गई इमेज से कहीं बेहतर है। उनकी कॉंट्रोवर्सी में भी एक ईमानदारी रही है वे खुद एक बड़े राजनेता थे और उस वक्त में थे जब संजय का जेल में आना जाना लगा रहता था। उनके राजनेता के किरदार को सिर्फ मुम्बई दंगों के वक्त जनता में उतरे सहयोगी तक समेट दिया गया है। कमलेश के किरदार के ज़रिये हिरानी अपने नोबल कॉज़ फ्रेंड की विरासत को आगे बढ़ा रहे हैं। कमलेश का किरदार सपोर्टिंग है लेकिन बीच से एकदम गायब करना और फिर वापिस लाना थोड़ा सा अटपटा है। विक्की कौशल का काम इस फिल्म के सबसे बेहतरीन पहलू में से एक है।

अगर कहानी के मोटिव की बात करें तो फिल्म का शुरुआती हिस्सा ड्रग्स के खिलाफ व्यक्ति के उभरने की कहानी के रूप में पेश नज़र आता है। निजी ज़िंदगी से ज़्यादा संजय की ड्रग्स के साथ लड़ाई की कहानी ज़्यादा है। संजय के साथ दोस्ती निभाने के लिए यह हिस्सा काफी था। लेकिन दूसरा हिस्सा संजय दत्त की गुड इमेज बिल्डिंग और जस्टिफिकेशन से ज़्यादा कुछ नहीं है। जिस तरह जितनी नादानी के साथ अपनी गलतियों का स्पष्टीकरण दिया जा रहा है उस तरह तो लगभग हर अपराधी के पास अपनी एक कहानी है।

यरवदा जेल के रेडियो FM का कॉन्सेप्ट पता नहीं कितना सच है अगर सच है भी तो क्या वहां रेडियो जॉकी जोकि खुद कैदी है क्या अपनी कहानी सुनाता है? संजय से ज़्यादा ईमानदार उनके पिता, उनके दोस्त और उनकी पत्नी मान्यता को दिखाया गया है। ये फिल्म संजय दत्त की इमेज सुधारने के लिए मान्यता की पहल पर राजू हिरानी ने दोस्ती निभाने के लिए बनाई है ऐसा फिल्म देखते-देखते अहसास हो जाता है।

राजू हिरानी ने इस फिल्म में भी अपना ट्रेड मार्क दिया है। जिस तरह टेंशन के वक्त जादू की झप्पी, ऑल इज़ वेल, गांधीगिरी का कॉन्सपेट पूर्व फिल्मों में दिया गया था उसी तरह इस फिल्म में भी बॉलीवुड गानों के ज़रिये टेंशन से बचने का जादूई खिलौना बनाया गया है। निश्चित तौर पर टेंशन में म्यूज़िक एक अच्छा इलाज है लेकिन जिस तरह से ज़बरदस्ती गाने सुनने का तरीका इस्तेमाल किया गया है वह काफी स्टीरियोटाइप सा लगता है।

हर वक़्त साथ रहने वाले दोस्त सर्किट, रेंचो और भैरव के बाद कमलेश इस फेहरिश्त में अगला नाम है। राजू हिरानी इस फिल्म में अपने स्तर से काफी नीचे नज़र आते हैं। डायरेक्शन भी कोई बहुत बेहतर नहीं है, चींटी ओर चूहे से बात करना इस्टैब्लिश नहीं हो पा रहा। फिल्म बहुत भागती हुई सी लग रही है। निश्चित तौर पर 37 साल का सफर 3 घण्टे में समेटना बहुत मुश्किल है लेकिन यह बहाना नहीं हो सकता क्योंकि बॉयोपिक में उससे भी अधिक समय को कम समय की फिल्मों में बहुत बेहतर तरीके से उकेरा जा चुका है।

समीक्षा हमेशा बेहतर और खराब के स्थापित मानकों से कम्पेयर करके ही होती है। राजू हिरानी द्वारा खुद के लिए स्थापित किये गए मानकों के साथ कम्पेयर करने पर यह फिल्म बहुत हल्की है। फिल्म का म्यूज़िक याद रखने लायक नहीं है। ए आर रहमान का नाम बेशक म्यूज़िक डायरेक्टर्स में है लेकिन बैकग्राउंड स्कोर से लेकर फिल्म का कोई भी गाना बेहतर गानों में शामिल हो सकने में कामयाब नही हो सकता। हां, कर मैदान फतेह गाना ज़रूर कुछ दिन मोटिवेशनल सॉंग के रूप में इस्तेमाल किया जा सकता है।

अंत मे यह रणबीर और विक्की की फिल्म है यही मानकर देखने के जाएं, संजय दत्त की फिल्म की नज़र से देखेंगे तो मेरी तरह निगेटिव ही लिखेंगे। रणबीर और विक्की को उनके काम के लिए सलाम…

The post राजू हिरानी की सबसे खराब फिल्मों में गिनी जाएगी ‘संजू’ appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

Children Of Migrant Workers Deserve Better, And These Young Professionals Want To Help

$
0
0

In my recent visit to Bangalore, I went to meet slum dwellers near Marathhalli, in the Mahadevpura Constituency, who are mainly construction workers, domestic workers, and rag pickers hailing from districts of Nadia, Murshidabad of West Bengal. According to the 2011 Census report, Karnataka’s migrant population was 2.5 crore which is a humongous figure for any state. Being predominantly a slum area, it is home to approximately 10,000 migrant workers with no proper arrangement of residence, sanitation, water supply, or electricity. Making a livelihood is a nightmare for these labourers, but one need in particular remains a distant dream—education for their children.

As they have migrated from West Bengal, most of their kids had their primary education in Bengali-medium schools under the West Bengal government. Therefore, these kids face difficulty in getting accustomed to Kannada. As a result, they feel repulsed by these new Kannada-medium schools as they know nothing about the basics of Kannada and they are gradually joining the league of school drop-outs. Moreover, for parents, the existing government schools, being so far from their residence, are of no use. This is for two reasons—one, they always fear their children will face physical harm, abuse, and even kidnapping on their way to school because they are migrants and ‘outsiders’; and two, the language barrier. The children have habit of speaking in their mother tongue (Bengali), they do not have a command over Kannada, which is required to enter the mainstream education system of Karnataka.

Migrant labourers remain neck-deep in poverty without any social security with episodic engagement of their children in rag-picking work, which takes away the interest to get education from both parents and children. So spending a whole day going to school isn’t a priority. It is an undeniable fact that in families where economic conditions are the worst, one head is equal to one means of earning.

Migration And Child Labour: A Reality Check

The issue of migrant labour is yet to be officially recognized by the Government of India as it has not ratified the International Labour Organization Convention 097 (C097), concerning Migration Employment. It is a shame that India is the founder member of the International Labour Organization but ironically as a nation we do not have any provision to address the plight of migrant labours.

Whereas on Child labour, even after India’s ratification of the International Labour Organization Convention 138 and 182 on Child labour, the children of the slum continue to work as rag-pickers, and garbage cleaning workers. It shows the disheartening and sad picture of our countrymen who are compelled to leave their home due to economic limitations and suffer without an end in sight.  Despite the law, this unending hardship continues under pin-drop silence from the public.

A Ray Of Hope

Since January 2018, young professionals of the city from different areas of work like IT sector and fields like teaching healthcare have begun lending an unconditional helping hand to the slum population. Pother Dabi, a progressive youth organization within city of Bangalore, is carrying out a collective effort to engage with these 10,000 Bengali migrant workers. This organization is not an NGO, a Trust, nor a CSR initiative of any corporate company.  The aim behind the name remains very interesting and significant as “Pother Dabi” is the name of a famous bestselling Bengali novel of Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyaya, which he wrote in 1926. This novel, which was banned by the British Raj, narrates the story of a revolutionary who, hardened by his struggles and always on the run from the authorities, directly confronted the oppressive colonial rule. The message of the novel provides the prototype for these young professionals to make a platform and to take a stand for a cause.

The volunteers of Pother Dabi belong to the Bengali community, and can communicate with the migrant population in Marathhalli. They have taken this initiative with a motive to stand by the oppressed, safeguarding their basic rights, and fulfilling needs like education for their children. The wholesome effort is to bring children (who have episodic engagement as child labour) back into fold of education. Pother Dabi’s primary activity includes these professionals providing the children classes on English and Mathematics during weekends. Though they feel these efforts aren’t sufficient to make these children enter into mainstream education system but reactivating their interest in studies remains the immediate priority.

The above mentioned effort also reminds me of the steps taken by the government of Kerala for its own 25 lakh-strong migrant population. It has provided health insurance to millions of migrant workers with free medical service, along with ensuring them minimum wage. The government decided to publish “Hamari Malayalam”, a textbook to teach migrant labourers Malayalam, the predominant language of the state.

Safety, social security, and education for the migrant population remains a definite task of the state government. A society of individuals or groups with compassion, and feelings of fraternity towards migrant workers is undoubtedly a welcome gesture, but at the same in a democracy the elected representative and the government has a bigger responsibility to serve the needy and marginalized section of society be it a native or a migrant population. The inclusive participation of Bengali residents or anyone from city the of Bangalore to empower slum dwellers should be encouraged by all and the government of Karnataka too.

I hope these migrant workers from West Bengal in city of Bangalore get the facilities which they need to lead a decent life.

Featured image for representation only. Photo by Abhinav Saha/Hindustan Times via Getty Images.

The post Children Of Migrant Workers Deserve Better, And These Young Professionals Want To Help appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.


Why You Should Watch Sanju (Just Once)

$
0
0

SPOILER ALERT: This article contains a few spoilers from the movie “Sanju”. Reader discretion is advised.

A debutant Bollywood actor, crushed under the legacy of his father, struggles on the first day of his shoot. Incited by a friend, he succumbs to the pleasures of drugs as they help release his inhibitions. Within three days, he is an addict, and by the time his film premiers, he’s tried every kind of addiction that possibly exists – smoking, sex, alcohol, injections and psychedelics.

By this time, he has lost his mother to cancer and his girlfriend to an arranged marriage. His career droops helplessly and he struggles to make sense of his life. Encouraged by his father and another friend – an honest and emotionally stable Gujarati man from New York whom he meets in a serendipitous situation – he fights back and successfully overcomes his addiction.

But, life is not fair to this actor and a series of controversies plague him for the rest of his life. Rajkumar Hirani’s “Sanju” is a biopic on Sanjay Dutt, famously infamous for his roles as a gangster or a cop, and his notorious reputation in the media for alleged links with terrorism which were proven false later.

Biopics on living people are quickly becoming a rage. Started in Hollywood a few years ago, this trend found tremendous success with movies like “The Theory Of Everything” (based on Stephen Hawking), “The Social Network” (based on Mark Zuckerberg), and it has spread to Bollywood (with the success of “M.S.Dhoni: The Untold Story” and “Dangal”) and streaming platforms like Netflix (“The Crown”).

There are quite a few upcoming movies that will portray the stories of living people on celluloid. “The Accidental Prime Minister” has Anupam Kher playing Manmohan Singh and Shraddha Kapoor is all set to essay the role of Saina Nehwal in an untitled film. There are reports on Paresh Rawal starring in a film on Narendra Modi’s life.

What do audiences expect from a biopic? The truth, mainly! Authenticity, unbiased storytelling, inspiring anecdotes, honest portrayal of real incidents etc. Well, the good news is that “Sanju” definitely lives up to some of these expectations. The sad news is that “Sanju” is not a complete portrayal of Sanjay Dutt’s life. The movie conveniently selects only a few portions from his life, most of which are already well-known to the public and serve as a clarification to his tarnished image.

The first half depicts his struggles with parental pressure and his fight against drug addiction. The second half deals with terrorism allegations and his term in jail for having an AK-56. Both these acts are sewn together with the central plot of Sanjay Dutt getting to convince an international biographer (played by Anushka Sharma) to write a book about him. This technique of having an ongoing central plot that binds the rest of the movie is a trademark of screenplay writers, Rajkumar Hirani and his long-term associate, Abhijat Joshi, have displayed earlier with “3 Idiots” and “PK”. But, this time the centrepiece doesn’t hold that well. It is quite predictable and doesn’t contribute to the storyline. Anushka’s blue lenses and fake tears don’t help either.

The film highlights the shoddy practices of modern-day journalism, notorious for publishing false reports and manipulating readers by using phrases like ‘according to sources’, ‘based on allegations’, ‘rumors suggest’ etc. They conveniently use a question mark in their heading to avert legal consequences. Paresh Rawal’s dialogues aptly elucidate this point. But, by editing out major portions of Sanjay Dutt’s life and only portraying certain aspects of it, I don’t know how different the writers can claim to be from journalists.

There are a lot of unanswered questions – Sanju’s relationship with Manyata (portrayed by Dia Mirza) hardly throws light on their love story, his marriages to Richa and Rhea receive no mention, and in terms of his career – except for “Rocky”, “Munnabhai MBBS” and a blink and miss shot of Khalnayak’s poster – none of his other movies are mentioned. (“Vaastav”, “Mission Kashmir”, “Kaante”, “Agneepath” etc.)

But, there are definitely portions of the movie that stand out, which is why you should watch Sanju at least once –

1. Kar Har Maidan Fateh – This song can become an anthem for rehabilitation. Sanjay’s earnest efforts to overcome drug addiction and Rajkumar Hirani’s brilliant translation of this episode onto the screen deserve applause. Sukhwinder Singh’s voice adds so much depth to Shekhar Astitwa’s lyrics. Shreya does a good job as well, for singing the mother’s portion of the song. The visual journey of the character climbing his way to the summit, faltering and rising constantly, motivated by his mother’s voice and form, is deeply moving. Here’s a man who is aware that he is on the wrong path and is genuinely trying to change himself. His fight with drug abuse and his ultimate triumph can serve as an inspiration to many.

2. Father-Son Relationship – The tumultuous relationship between Sunil Dutt and Sanjay Dutt is beautifully brought to life by Paresh Rawal and Ranbir Kapoor. Their constant struggle to seek and support each other is heart-rending. The speech Sanjay wants to make in honour of his father but fails to, the father’s timely lessons to his son using meaningful songs, their work together in the “Munnabhai” films, and their individual battles towards the mutual uplifting of their relationship are brilliantly drafted on celluloid.

3. Friendship – A tribute to the real-life friendship of Sanjay Dutt and Kamlesh Kapasi. “Sanju” beautifully portrays their struggles, misunderstandings, fallouts and their ultimate patch-up in 2016 after the former’s release from jail. Watch the real footage of Sanjay Dutt’s release and you’ll notice the stark resemblance to the scene in the movie.

Manisha Koirala is charming as Nargis. She breathes life into the celluloid. Paresh Rawal as Sunil Dutt is convincing, but Ranbir steals the show as Sanjay Dutt. He essays the role of Sanju effortlessly and brilliantly, so much so that one really wonders if we’re watching him or Sanjay Dutt himself (until we see them both in the post-credits song).

Rajkumar Hirani could have done better had he not let his personal feelings for Sanjay Dutt affect the film. The biopic should have been unbiased, giving the audience a chance to decide if we want to empathize with Sanjay Dutt or not.

What did you think of the movie Sanju?

The post Why You Should Watch Sanju (Just Once) appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

मीडिया का, सरकार का, समाज का सबका खबर लेने वाला Anti National रैप साँग

$
0
0

हमेशा से लगता था कि कश्मीर-खालिस्तान , हिन्दू-मुसलमान, आरक्षण जैसे मुद्दे हद संवेदनशील है जिन पर ज़्यादा ध्यान ना देकर समय के भरोसे छोड़ देना चाहिए क्योंकि इन पर होने वाली बहस का कोई अंत नहीं है। लोगों को कभी न कभी तो समझ आना है, लेकिन लगता है देर लगेगी। आजकल जब भी टीवी चलाओ तो 6 लोग बहस कर रहे होते हैं। सभी न्यूज़ एंकर एक ज़ुबान बोल रहे हैं। पहले लोग आमजन की समस्याओं के लिए सरकार को कोसा करते थे, आजकल आपस में ही एक दूसरे को कोस रहे हैं। सोचकर कभी डर लगता है तो कभी हंसी भी आ जाती है।

हिन्दुओं को लगता है कि मुसलमानों की संख्या बढ़ना खतरा है और मुसलमानों को लगता है कि हिन्दुओं से लड़ने के लिए संख्या बढ़ानी पड़ेगी। दरअसल ना हिन्दू बढ़े ना मुसलमान, रोबोट्स ज़्यादा तेज़ी से बढ़ रहे है।

प्रधानमंत्री रोबोट बनाओ योजना के तहत आगामी 10 वर्षो में सभी भारतीयों को रोबोट बना दिये जाने का लक्ष्य है। यह रोबोट आधुनिक तकनीक से लैस राष्ट्रवाद की चिप से चलेगा जिसका कोई ऑपरेटिंग सिस्टम नहीं होगा बल्कि ‘सिस्टम’ ही इसको ऑपरेट करेगा। जहां अन्य प्रोसेसर में RAM व ROM दोनों होते हैं, आश्चर्यजनक रूप से इसके तो ROM ROM में ही RAM है।

हालांकि जानकारों का कहना है कि किसान एंव मज़दूर वर्ग उक्त योजना से अभी भी वंचित हैं और आये दिन प्रदर्शन कर सरकार से नाराज़गी जता रहे हैं। वहीं दूसरी तरफ हमारा युवा बहुत खुश है जो आज राष्ट्रीय ज्ञान एंव अनुसंधान बोर्ड की व्हाट्सएप्प विश्वविद्यालय से उत्तीर्ण हो चुका है और अन्य मेधावी छात्रों के साथ मुसलमानों के ट्रक और फ्रिज में काम ढूंढ रहा है। इनके सपनो की नगरी बम्बई नही अयोध्या हो चुकी है।

राष्ट्रवाद के कारण गोरक्षा, मंदिर, योग जैसे क्षेत्रों में रोज़गार के अवसर बढ़े हैं। वर्तमान हालात यह है कि भारत भले ही प्रति व्यक्ति आय में पीछे रह रहा हो लेकिन व्हाट्सएप्प और गौ-रक्षा के दम पर क्रमशः “प्रति व्यक्ति राय” और “प्रति व्यक्ति गाय” की दरों में अभूतपूर्व वृद्धि हुई है। मुख्यमंत्री आवास की जगह रामजन्मभूमि पर डेरा डालने की चाह रखने वाले ये असाधारण लोग ज़्यादा ज्ञान प्राप्ति के दम्भ में ज़मीन से ऊपर उड़ने लगे हैं, जिस कारण अच्छी सड़कें अब इनकी ज़रूरत नहीं रही।

इन सब हालातों को देखते हुए हमने राष्ट्र को यह गाना समर्पित किया है, जिसे सुनने के बाद हमे ‘इंट्रेस्टिंग फैक्ट्स’ दिखाए जाकर हमारा सामान्य ज्ञान दुरुस्त करने के प्रयास युद्ध स्तर पर प्रारम्भ हो चुके हैं, एन्टी नेशनल कहा जा रहा है, घर का पता पूछा जा रहा है और यह तक भी कहा जा रहा है कि जब व्हाट्सएप्प पर ज्ञान बंट रहा था तब कहाँ सो रहे थे ? “हम जैमिंग कर रहे थे और गाने बना रहे थे, जो hindipendent जल्द ही पेश करेगा, धन्यवाद।”

The post मीडिया का, सरकार का, समाज का सबका खबर लेने वाला Anti National रैप साँग appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

Your Social Media Addiction Isn’t Accidental — Here’s The Proof

$
0
0

During my last semester at university, I took a course titled “Data, Social Media, and Free Speech”. Our professor made it very clear to us in the beginning of the course itself that we were absolutely not allowed to use our smartphones or laptops throughout the one-and-a-half hours of class time. Yet, to his dismay, he frequently caught students sneaking a peek at their phones, almost as if they couldn’t help but look at those tiny screens, much like drug addicts have absolutely no control over their drug habits.

Recent research shows that on an average, we tap, swipe, type and click on our phones about 2,617 times a day, and the heaviest users touch their phones a whopping 5,427 times a day. Per year, that translates to nearly 1 million touches on an average, and for the less restrained, almost 2 million. This poses the question: When and how did we become so dependent on technology? What is it about social media that makes us keep coming back for more?

The answer lies in what can be identified as the attention economy (aka the attention industry), an economy which monopolises our attention. Our addiction is a direct result of the intention of tech companies such as Facebook, Twitter and Snapchat, who build ‘sticky’ products that people can’t stop using, and therefore become profitable.

Think about it. Likes on Facebook or Instagram make you feel better about yourself, urging you to post and update more content in order to gain repeated social validation. Snapchat’s ‘Snapstreaks’ feature was designed to ensure you open and use the app at least once a day, encouraging near-constant communication amongst users, due to the fear of missing out on a ‘snapstreak’. LinkedIn exploits a need for social reciprocity to widen its user base, masquerading as a formal communications network. And even YouTube and Netflix autoplay videos and next episodes, depriving users of a choice on whether or not they want to keep watching, hence creating a generation of ‘binge-watchers’, hooked to their screens, watching an entire season of a TV show in just one day.

But believe it or not, the race to commodify human attention has been on for quite some time now, and possibly emerged during the first World War. As Tim Wu, describes in his book “The Attention Merchants: The Epic Scramble to Get Inside Our Heads”, back in 1914 when Britain could only mobilise 7,00,000 men to fight the war – as compared to Germany’s 4.5 million – the British Government embarked on a journey to recruit young men to its army with the use of a systematic propaganda. It printed around 50 million big, colourful, eye grabbing posters and plastered them almost everywhere, held rallies and parades, and screened patriotic films on huge film projectors all over the country. The result? Millions of men, convinced by the government’s persuasion and their ‘new-found’ patriotism, marched towards their deaths in what we call the First World War today.

Wu thinks that’s the moment we realised the true power of capturing human attention and hence emerged the “attention merchants”, an industry hell-bent on doing anything and everything to harness the power of human attention. His book tells us the story of the extraordinarily successful attempts by advertisers to occupy more and more of our attention over the past 100 years, drawing our attention to the technologies and platforms that have made it possible for the media to penetrate into our daily lives on such an extreme level over the years. Consequently, it’s no surprise that technologies of our generation such as the smartphone and the internet are using the same approach as the British Propaganda, capturing our attention with new gimmicks every day, making sure we’re hooked to our devices till the last minute in order to generate almost unimaginable profit margins for tech companies.

Interestingly, Justin Rosenstein, a software programmer, has banned himself from using Snapchat and Instagram, restricted his Facebook usage and as a more radical step, made his assistant set up parental controls on his iPhone to prevent him from installing any apps. He is particularly aware of the allure of the concept of “likes”, and the psychology behind it, which he describes as “bright dings of pseudo-pleasure which can be as hollow as they are seductive”. After all, Rosenstein was the Facebook engineer who created the ‘Like’ button in the first place.

It seems that even tech giants quickly realised the danger that looms over our heads, as most of them have since then made conscious efforts to curb their social media/gadget usage. Mark Zuckerberg has a team of moderators and employees who control his Facebook feed for him. The most senior executives from Twitter barely ever tweet themselves, one having only sent out four tweets since he joined. Apple’s co-founder and CEO Steve Jobs used to limit how much technology his kids used at home, a practice which even the current CEO Tim Cook follows with his nephew. But what can we do to keep our own usage in check?

To start with, we too should make conscious efforts to limit our internet/smartphone usage. Obviously, it’s easier said than done; the whole concept of addiction has the underlying principle of impulses built into it. So, if you think you’re addicted to your smartphone, or just simply want to reduce its usage, here are some tips you could try to curb that addiction:

  1. As ridiculous as it sounds, set your phone to greyscale. Former Google Designer Tristan Harris believes that “stripping your phone away of its colour can make your phone less enticing”, since “we’re simple animals, excited by bright colours”. Read more about it here.
  2. Turn off your phone’s vibration/notification ringtones. Notifications derail our attention drastically, so if you can, block notifications for all social media apps, or at least the ones you know you can live without getting instant updates from.
  3. Taking it one step further, delete all apps which add no significant value to your life. Do you really need all those apps on your phone? How many of them do you really use? Take a moment to think about it. If you don’t use it, delete it. And if you know your triggers, remove those apps from your home screen, so that you don’t have instant access to them as soon as you unlock your phone.
  4. Most importantly, keep yourself on a schedule. Make a conscious effort to restrict your smartphone usage, whether it’s by setting alarms which allow you to check your phone only when the alarm goes off, by installing an app which tracks and restricts your screen time, or just by your own willpower to stay away from your gadgets, even if it’s only possible during the weekends or while you’re on vacation.

These tech companies aren’t going to give up their endless efforts to make sure you stay addicted to their products, but that doesn’t mean you should remain stuck in the vicious cycle of your addiction. Be smart, recognise the problem, and give yourself a chance at a tech-free life, ridding yourself of the stress and anxiety produced by the constant use of these technologies.

Are you addicted to social media?

The post Your Social Media Addiction Isn’t Accidental — Here’s The Proof appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

Has Reservation In Politics Actually Helped People From Scheduled Caste Groups?

$
0
0

By Jennifer Bussel for India Ink:

What are the effects of affirmative action policies? To what extent do such policies sufficiently address the injustices that years of discrimination have imposed on specific groups within a society? In “Social Justice Through Inclusion: The Consequences of Electoral Quotas in India, Francesca Jensenius takes on the difficult but important task of answering these questions. She uses an important example of reservations in electoral constituencies for members of India’s scheduled caste (SC) groups—formerly called “untouchables”, known today as Dalits. Here, she sheds new light on the differential effects that such policies may have on members of their target groups.

The empirical context for Jensenius’ analysis is India’s state legislative assemblies, which, since 1950, have utilized quotas to ensure that members of scheduled caste groups hold a portion of legislative seats. Overall, 15% of India’s state legislators are elected from SC “reserved” constituencies. While reservations were initially intended to last for only 10 years, they have been retained indefinitely. In this book, Jensenius sets out to examine the implications of this extensive and extended history of affirmative action.

Ram Nath Kovind, India’s second Dalit president. Image source : Wikipedia

Jensenius’ primary argument, as I see it, rests on an important conceptual distinction between the possible goals of policies that are designed to promote social justice. While many assume that the goal of affirmative action policies for elected officials is group representation—specifically the descriptive representation that results from having a member of one’s group in elected office—she argues that this is not the only possible goal. Policies may instead be designed (implicitly or explicitly) in ways that promote group integration. The key distinction here, using her findings in the Indian context as an example, “is that the quotas have brought to power SC politicians who look and behave similarly to other politicians—not SC politicians who focus on working for the interests of the SC community” (3).

Thus, individuals who are elected via a quota system (designed in a manner that promotes integration) will become a part of the political system in ways that might well have been impossible without quotas. These SC representatives, then, like their fellow legislators, support policies that respond to the needs of the population at large—or their voting base—rather than only their co-ethnics. This distinction also clarifies the importance of considering the effects of policies on elites versus the general public or, more specifically, between the politicians themselves, and the voters.

Jensenius combines this discussion with attention to Nancy Fraser’s three aspects of social justice upon which we might expect affirmative action policies to have effects: redistribution, political participation, and recognition. Any one policy may have effects on none, some, or all of these dimensions, for either or both elites and the general public. Her argument, then, is that we should not necessarily expect to see strong effects of reservations on all aspects of social justice and for all members of a targeted group. In the specific case of India, reservation policies for elected office have been designed in a manner that promotes integration rather than representation. She suggests that we should expect effects on political participation and recognition, not on redistribution. Additionally, as effects in society are mediated by effects at the elite level, we are more likely to observe changes in outcomes for elected SC politicians themselves, with potentially more moderated positive effects for SC voters.

To test these expectations, Jensenius marshals a substantial collection of constituency- and sub-constituency-level data in 15 major states. She does this by through the three forms of social justice, for both politicians and voters, primarily over the period 1974 to 2007. During this period, the assignment of reserved constituencies across India’s states remained constant. In order to make the strongest possible inferences, she evaluates outcomes across not only the full set of constituencies in these states, but also a smaller set of matched constituencies. This offers the closest possible approximation to the random assignment of reservations.

The magnitude of work that went into creating these datasets, and their contribution to the broader public of India scholars, cannot be overstated (I am one of many who has already utilized a portion of these data in my own work). Jensenius’ meticulous efforts pay dividends that are evident immediately in the empirical chapters. In addition, she combines these quantitative data sources with rich insights from detailed and extensive qualitative work, based on substantial time in the field with Indian politicians. Is there a limitation to this work? Perhaps the lack of discussion in the main text about why she chose particular states, and how she identified politicians for interviews. These types of details would be quite useful for two reasons. First, for evaluating the generalisability of the qualitative insights; second, for guiding future researchers interested in using a similar methodology. Overall, however, this mixed-method approach offers a unique and much-needed look into the lives and work of Indian legislators.

The Speaker, Lok Sabha, Smt. Meira Kumar proposing Vote of Thanks during the Meeting in Honour of President of United States of America, Mr. Barack Obama in the Central Hall of Parliament House, in New Delhi on November 8, 2010. Source: Public.Resource.Org/Flickr.

The empirical analyses are organized according to the main categories of the conceptual framework, alternating between effects on elites and on the general public. This structure works quite well for comparing outcomes, though I think Jensenius could have been even more explicit about returning to the framework and the existing expectations in the literature in each chapter. Because the findings are often contrary to what a casual observer of such policies might expect, it is worth emphasizing the areas in which findings do depart from such expectations.

Overall, the key finding of the book, as hinted above, is that reservation policies for Indian state legislators have their most striking effects on legislators themselves, rather than the general public. SC politicians become substantially better represented within legislatures—by default due to the reservations—and are nominated across all of the major parties. However, this effect generally does not extend beyond reserved constituencies. SC legislators have gained political skills and increased their likelihood of rerunning for office and gaining cabinet positions, though not to the same extent as legislators from general constituencies. Further, SC legislators have faced substantially reduced forms of discrimination, with interviewees often noting that people would not dare to treat them in the discriminatory manner historically experienced by SC individuals. Yet, for the most part, these same outcomes are not experienced by SC voters in reserved constituencies, compared to their peers in general constituencies. They do not feel better represented by their co-ethnics, they have not fared better as measured by socio-economic indicators, and they experience more limited reductions in discrimination, compared to their representatives. This does not mean that the status of SCs in the general public has not improved over this period, but we cannot attribute any observed improvements directly to the presence of reservations for SCs in the state legislatures.

Beyond this important overall finding, I want to note a few other insights that emerge from the empirical analysis. First, Jensenius highlights a recent trend by political parties in India—nominating women in SC reserved constituencies. She notes that this may be due in part to an expectation that reservations for women may be imposed at some point in the near future. Even if this is not the case, the shift in reservations does suggest that parties are responding to some pressure to nominate more women, but they are doing so by placing women in SC reserved seats. As a result, as she notes, female SC candidates are displacing male SC candidates, rather than ‘general caste’ male candidates. Elite non-SC male politicians thereby limit the distributive effects of changes in nomination patterns by retaining the largest possible portion of seats for themselves. The implications of this strategy for our thinking about the role of women in Indian politics are worth exploring in greater detail.

Second, Jensenius employs a unique and much-needed analysis of cabinet nominations. Through an evaluation of cabinets across all of the states in her analysis over 30 years (and an even more detailed examination of all cabinet posts in Uttar Pradesh over the same period), she highlights the general allocation of postings to SCs was to less prominent (and lucrative) postings, though the quality of postings has improved over time. This shows not only that SCs are not yet on par with their peers in terms of cabinet positions, as Jensenius notes, but also that, again, non-SC politicians are strategically retaining for themselves posts that are likely to offer them the greatest monetary and other resources for furthering their personal status and political careers.

Mayawati, Uttar Pradesh’s first female chief minister from a scheduled caste.

Finally, and perhaps more optimistically, Jensenius identifies an important trend in the political skills of SC legislators. In an analysis of turnout in reserved and non-reserved constituencies, she shows that while turnout did drop in reserved constituencies just after reservations were instated, this gap narrowed over time. Drawing on survey evidence, she suggests that lower turnout is not due to voter discontent with their position in a reserved constituency, but rather with the skill of SC politicians, or lack thereof, in mobilizing individuals to vote. As politicians in reserved constituencies gained skills over time, they, like their peers in non-reserved constituencies, have been able to mobilize voters and thereby improve turnout levels. This is one particularly nice example of the dynamics highlighted in earlier parts of the book, in which SC politicians have substantially improved in their ability to function as legislators.

In closing, I’d like to highlight the need for continued research on two possible additional effects of reservations on caste-based discrimination in the general population. First, while Jensenius considers the risk of backlash from reservations, there is little discussion in the text of violence as a particular form of backlash. It would be useful to extend the discussion of discrimination to forms violence that have historically been inflicted on scheduled castes, so as to understand whether or not there have been improvements, or worsening, in conditions of violence not measured here.

Second, Jensenius’ findings at times hint at differential effects within the scheduled caste population, as individuals from certain castes acquire political office at potentially higher rates than those from others. Further exploration of the ways in which existing biases leak into the reservation system, thereby potentially increasing inequalities within the broadly defined group of scheduled castes, could offer important insights that build nicely on the foundation laid by Jensenius in this text.

Overall, this is an important book that forces us to redirect our expectations about the likely outcomes of affirmative action policies and, in so doing, to recognize the importance of institutional design in determining these outcomes. Reservations, in and of themselves, do not ensure the eradication of years of injustice against certain groups. In particular, reservations for political office designed in ways that encourage group integration, rather than representation, are likely to be limited in their effects on a number of dimensions. Yet, Jensenius’ work goes a long way in helping us to see how these types of policies may encourage changes that can directly benefit some individuals, while indirectly affecting the lives of many others.

Jennifer Bussell is an Assistant Professor of Political Science and Public Policy at the University of California, Berkeley. Her research concerns the comparative politics of developing countries, with an emphasis on India. In her forthcoming book, Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies, she examines the role of high-level politicians in providing non-partisan constituency service to citizens across India and the world.
For more research stories like this, find the rest of the South Asia Reading Group here.

The post Has Reservation In Politics Actually Helped People From Scheduled Caste Groups? appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

Dear Funders, Look Towards The Northeast, And Invest There

$
0
0

By Biswanath Sinha

There has been little or no interest among funders in looking at the Northeast region of our country. But this lack of attention and investment is impacting not only the development of the communities in the eight states of the region but also the economic opportunities that they have access to.

It is therefore important for all of us in the sector–especially funders–to understand the nuances of the region better if we are to improve the development indicators for the country as a whole.

Reasons for lack of funder interest in the Northeast

Most funders are unfamiliar with the region and territory
Twenty years ago, when there was any development report in India, and there was data being collected and analysed, there would be data on all the states and then there would be a category called ‘other states’ – which basically comprised Jammu and Kashmir, Sikkim and the seven northeastern states.

Everyone knows (or ought to know) that Manipur is not the same as Assam, which is not the same as Arunachal Pradesh, and it’s definitely not the same as J&K. But they were still all lumped together as other states.

While today there is state-and district-wise data available, there is still little interest in understanding the region and the issues there. Funders and practitioners find it easier to stay away.

There is limited knowledge regarding the issues facing the states in the Northeast
Take the criteria of economic development or per capita income of the population. Contrary to popular opinion, it’s not the districts in the north-central states of India like Jharkhand, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, that are the lowest performing in terms of economic development and per capita income, but those in the Northeast.

If you see the different Human Development Reports published by the UN agencies and Government of India, in a survey where they mapped all the districts in India on multiple parameters, the Northeastern states fared well on health and education but did poorly on economic development.

However since the index was a composite comprising multiple indicators–health, education, employability, per capita income, and so on–in the 25 lowest performing districts, there are only one or two from the Northeast. Most of the ‘poor performing’ districts were from Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha and Chhattisgarh. As a result, the investment for development went to these regions.

Therefore an index like this was unable to tell the whole story of just how much the northeastern states lagged on the economic development front; this meant that little or no attention was paid to these districts.

There is an assumption that overheads incurred in managing operations in this region will be high
The region is considered too far from where most of the decision makers work and live–Delhi, Mumbai and Bangalore. Second, given the low density of populations served and the distances between local habitations, the costs incurred in running a programme are likely to be higher than densely populated villages in central India.  There is also the belief that the ‘impact’ will be less because people ‘reached’ will be lower in absolute numbers.

Population density in the Northeast is lower than the average for India, in part because of the local terrain | Photo courtesy: Tata Trusts

There is uncertainty and fear regarding the region
There are assumptions made by decision-makers in the large cities regarding the intensity of conflict in the region. There is also a fear of whether the money will go into the wrong hands. And, while that might have or haven’t been the case earlier, it definitely isn’t the case now.  The law and order situation has improved significantly across the different states in the region, and in general, the aspirations of the youth have driven the states to become more politically stable.

It is critical to get support from the state governments
Even if funders are willing to look at investing in programmes in the Northeast, it is important that they receive adequate support from the local governments. And given the influence that the states exercise on the lives of the people-–most of the employment is provided by government jobs–it is important to work with them.

But in most cases, the priority of the state departments is on how to get more money from the central government. Moreover, because there is uncertainty regarding the quantum of funds that can be availed and the time it takes to get this money, there is less priority within the states on preparing a road map for development and improving things on the ground.

The focus on the development of the communities might have been stronger had the states generated their own incomes instead of being heavily dependent on central assistance.

In this context, funders can help demonstrate good developmental models and then work towards influencing the priorities of the state governments or autonomous councils.

Lessons from our experience in the Northeast

The Tata Trusts have been working in the Northeast for the last 12 years. In that time, we’ve had our challenges, but we’ve also learned a great deal from the state governments, nonprofits, communities, and the people in the region.

We believe that the northeastern states need more attention and investment and we hope that our learnings might be useful for funders who are keen to create significant change in an area that has been neglected till date.

It’s important to look at the right indicators
If you go by enrolment in primary schools and overall literacy rates, then the northeastern states perform better than the other Indian states. It makes sense then that donors don’t feel the need to invest in the Northeast, at least in elementary education.

But if you look at health, some of these states are at the bottom of the pile. Assam is the worst performing state in the country when it comes to maternal mortality rates, and the northeastern states put together have the highest incidence of cancer in the country. Nagaland, for instance, doesn’t have a single medical college.

Even in the case of education, there is no data on learning outcomes; so, despite high enrolment, we still don’t know if children are benefitting from going to school. The percentage of students completing a degree course is also abysmally low.

Don’t judge success by numbers
One can’t compare the scale of operations here with other parts of the country. In India we have a population of 382 people per sq km; this is the average number many funders and nonprofits factor in when talking about project outreach, scaling up, and so on.

When we are working in Arunachal Pradesh however, we have to bear in mind that we are working in 15 villages, each of which has only between 40-60 households and is possibly 5 km away from the neighbouring village.

One, therefore, cannot compare these programmes with projects from other areas and say ”Why are we able to reach 5,000 farmers in Satara with an investment of ₹1 crore while in Arunachal, we can only manage to reach 500 farmers?”

First, you are working with a community whose exposure to the outside world is extremely limited. There is no railway line in Manipur and Sikkim, while Arunachal Pradesh and Sikkim have airports. Most of the states are devoid of good public transport too.

Second, you are working in a place that is thinly populated; so one shouldn’t compare to mainland states in terms of scale and time required to bring about results. Maybe Tripura and Assam can be compared to the other states in India, in terms of population density, but with the mountainous states, one needs to be more patient.

This cannot be a numbers game.

The numbers will be smaller, but the change is transformational
If as a funder, you and your partners are able to identify the right issues, work on the right kind of projects, and create models and prototypes that show how these projects can be impactful, you can influence where government funding can be directed.

Make the state governments understand that these are issues that matter, these are the right investments, and expose them to new approaches.

For instance, given the demand for pork in the state and the fact that most of it is currently imported from non-northeastern states like Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, can we demonstrate a sustainable piggery model that will encourage a change in the pig breeding policy of the Nagaland government? Or can we influence the Nagaland government to consider that ‘if you are getting a budget of ₹100 for livestock, can you invest ₹80 in piggery and can you do this in a manner that is sustainable?’

There’s also the example of the development of the milk production industry in Manipur. Traditionally the way the supply of milk has happened in this state is that one ties up with a farmer who has one to two cows; they will come to your house, and you pay them on a weekly or monthly basis. Now with our intervention, which involves helping the communities form dairy activity groups and providing marketing and supply chain support, Manipur produces, packages and sells packaged milk.

These are not big projects–we started with 5,000 litres per day–now it’s over 10,000 litres per day. But the state now has farmer producer groups and a sustainable means of livelihood–a marked change from the past. The cooperative we worked with, YVU Milk Producer Company, is now the largest market player in dairy products in the state. More importantly, it helped demonstrate a successful model to the state government.

There is strong acceptance from the communities
Once you spend enough time with the communities, however, there is greater acceptance of the development work than in communities from other parts of India. Most of them are small communities, closely knit, once they accept you, then there is very strong acceptance of the programmes. There is no ambiguity on their part.

It is important to have diversity in the team that serves the Northeast
The region is extremely diverse in terms of populations that reside there. It is more diverse than the rest of the country put together. We work with so many tribes—micro and minor tribes, some not recognised by the state government, and some whose citizenship is under question. We need to take all of them along.

In many places, each village is populated with only one tribe, and each one is very different from the other in customs, language, practices. It is therefore important to have diversity in the team that supports the northeastern work.

Put the right team together and invest in them
Generally speaking, no one from the rest of India will want to move there. Therefore, it is important to develop local talent and put time, energy and resources on human resources there. We started from zero. We knew that nobody from Maharashtra or Gujarat would be interested in coming to the Northeast to work on a long-term basis. So, we had to bet on the locals. We did, however, take the required help and support from across the country.

There isn’t a dearth of qualified people–if you go to TISS Mumbai, there are at least 100 students from the Northeast doing their Masters and PhD. They just need platforms that allow them to earn decent money and do good work.

Above all, be patient.

About the author: Biswanath Sinha oversees Tata Trusts’ field operations in the eastern and northeastern parts of India. He has been with the Trusts since 2005. Before joining Tata Trusts, he implemented developmental projects on agriculture, irrigation, watershed and microfinance in Bihar and Jharkhand with PRADAN. He also worked on issues related to sustainable mountain development and financial inclusion for the poor. Biswanath serves on the boards of Collectives for Integrated Livelihoods Initiatives (CInI), Centre for Microfinance and Livelihoods (CML), North-East Initiative Development Association (NEIDA), Livolink Foundation, and Rashtriya Gramin Vikas Nidhi (RGVN). He has authored books on rural livelihoods and occasionally writes on agriculture, climate change and sports in various journals. He is trained as an engineer.

This article was originally published in India Development Review. You can view it here.

 

The post Dear Funders, Look Towards The Northeast, And Invest There appeared first and originally on Youth Ki Awaaz and is a copyright of the same. Please do not republish.

Viewing all 4758 articles
Browse latest View live